OT: "Abusive drivel"?? How so??

On Nov 26, 9:15 am, "Mike Avery" wrote in

formatting link
:

Oh yes. Definitely. And passionately. Your unending abusive drivel > has definitely aroused that sort of sentiment. And I am quite sure > that I am far from the only one who feels that way. > > However, to torture you, I'd have to know where you are and then I'd > have to actually be near you. > > Quite frankly, that is more distasteful than I could stand. We all > have our limits, and actually meeting you would be well beyond mine. > You are spared torture, but you continue to be the object of disdain > and contempt. Now then, do you think you could go and pollute some > other news group?

Please explain how my posts equate to "abusive drivel". I am simply expressing how a lot of the food manufacturers intentionally cheat customers.

Reply to
Green Xenon [Radium]
Loading thread data ...

Are you REALLY that unaware of the impression your posts make? You've apologized for your demeanor in other newsgroups, finally realizing that you were perceived as threatening. Are you surprised other people also find you offensive?

Your standard operating procedure is to inundate newsgroups with emails about inanities, such as gigabit dialup connections, 600 petahertz processors, and, now, impurities in dairy products.

Your posts are -

Abusive - with titles like, "Answer me or else I'll keep posting here until you do!"

Abusive - your posts are not on topic. This is rec.food.baking not rec.food.purity

Drivel - your posts go on forever with repetitive rants

Drivel - your posts contain endless and endlessly varying acronyms you make up on the spot and which make no sense whatsoever

Are you entitled to your opinions about food? Yes, definitely.

Are you entitled to post them here? Sadly, yes.

Do we have to like them? No, definitely not.

Do we have to pretend to like them? No, definitely not.

Do your posts have the singular redeeming value of being amusing? No, not at all.

If you seriously hold the positions you espouse, which I doubt, there are ways of making the points and sharing your views that don't automatically alienate the people with whom you are trying to communicate.

Reply to
Mike Avery

Mike, you're a very kind and well-spoken man.

Maybe I should say "well-written."

Linda G.

Reply to
Linda Grail

You know, when i read that first post about the cream, for a few minutes I honestly thought someone was testing a new version of The Complaint Generator.

And people call *me* abrasive.

Reply to
Eric Jorgensen

InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.