Trimming Between Letters

My friend's logo has long, thin letters with thin black outlining. I'm spending almost as much time trimming it as I did stitching it, even though I tried to do most of it as it went along. :-)

So I started digging around to learn more about jump stitches and digitizing and stuff like that.

I noticed that a lot of people leave those connecting stitches and don't trim them. Pretty much every website I've pulled up with examples -- both people who are digitizing and those who are doing the embroidery -- have examples that have at least some letters that still have those jump stitches.

Is there some reason not to trim them?

Reply to
Ellie
Loading thread data ...

On designs I purchase, I usually trim longer jump stitches, and leave short ones alone.

But when I create a text design I often create a full stop at the end of each letter, let the machine cut the thread, then move to the next one. That looks cleaner to me.

Beverly

Reply to
BEI Design

Yes when you're lucky enough (or smart enough) to have a machine that can cut the threads on command!

- Herb

Reply to
Herb

Mine takes several stitches in-place at the end of a color run (or when I instruct it to when I'm digitizing), then cuts and buries the thread end. Not meaning to gloat here, but I thought since mine did that *all* home machines did. ;-}

Reply to
BEI Design

I was reading a discussion about it on a forum, and someone mentioned that if they had to create a full stop at the end of each letter, it would be too time consuming, and easier just to clip. I haven't been able to download the program you told me about yet -- have to get to a DSL connection first -- so I haven't had a chance to try it out myself yet. Is it really that time consuming to create a full stop?

I agree with you -- I think it looks cleaner. Seems like it would be less work to create the full stop in the first place, than to try to snip it up later?

Thanks for info! :-)

Reply to
Ellie

LOL! Mine will cut it, but doesn't bury it. But does leave about an inch to and inch and a half of "tail" for me to get ahold of -- just have to be sure to snip that before it gets run over. :-)

Reply to
Ellie

If you are writing about the PSW 2.0a digitizing program, it is not downloadable.

formatting link
is installed from a CD, and requires a dongle. Also, it costs (or at least when I bought mine) over $700.00, and it's made for Singer machines, although it will "open" and "save as" in almost all home machine formats. I can send designs from my computer directly to my machine via a cable. I cannot find any site online which is selling Professional Sew Ware 2.0 right now.

That is my opinion. Although if you're doing production work, eliminating all the stops and leaving jump threads in place is probably more profitable.

You're welcome.

Reply to
BEI Design

I think you were the one that told me about the 30-day free trial -- was that Embird?

Oh, I'm not doing production work -- unless three shirts for my friend counts. :-D

Thanks!

Reply to
Ellie

For snipping thread tails, I use Littauer scissors. You can find them for under $5.00. Here is a link to one source:

formatting link
hook on the tip catches the thread, making it easier to cut if off close to the work.I hold the thread taut with Kelly forceps.http://www.quickmedical.com/search.html?q=kelly+forceps&x=0&y=0The tip locks onto the thread, making it easy to snip it close with the Littauer scissors.I got the idea for using those tools when a nurse gave me a (disposable) set after removing some stitches. NAYY

Reply to
BEI Design

Ummm, yeah, sorry. :-( I wrote about three different programs, I mis-remembered. Happens more and more these days...

Embird is definitely worth the $144.00 (was $99.00 when I bought it) registration to make it work after the 30 day free trial, IMHO.

Reply to
BEI Design

InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.