I have decided to stitch another female nude.

I think the title says it all. I finished my latest project, which was a picture from the Hubble telescope; towards the end, I got rather bored. For those who are not offended by Alberto Vargas nudes, you can find my girl at

formatting link
Thistime I am not going to stitch the background. I am doing it on a yellow32 count linen, 2 over 2, which I bought from Nordic Needle. I think Iwill try the shadow of her legs on the sand in half stitches. The patternif free to anyone else who wants it. Jim.

Reply to
F.James Cripwell
Loading thread data ...

I showed it to hubby, who educated me as to who Vargas is/was ( not sure which). Show us the finish when done, OK??

Gillian

Reply to
Gill Murray

Fred

formatting link
nothing changes, nothing changes.Don't back stitch to email, just stitchit.

Reply to
Fred

take care, Linda D. in B.C., Canada

WIP's: MLI's Gift of Peace and handknit socks with Trekking XXL

Reply to
Linda D.

I really like the poster, but as a stitching project I'm afraid I'd find it to have too few color changes.

Elizabeth

Reply to
Dr. Brat

I think the subtlety of the color changes are what appeal to the engineer in Jim. Heaven knows no Hubble pun) he does love a challenge!

Gill

Reply to
Gill Murray

Ok, just cuz Sheena tried to get me on gotten, may I point out that the subtlety of the color changes IS what appeals...?

Where is Sheena, anyway?

Elizabeth

Reply to
Dr. Brat

Have you EVER embroidered a MALE NUDE ???? mirjam

Reply to
mirjam

Sorry, Mirjam, but I cannot imagine why a heterosexual MALE would ever want to stitch a MALE nude. So, no, I never have. Jim.

Reply to
F.James Cripwell

Jim , i thought you stitch for the fun of stitching, or creating , Not to recreate a XST `playboy`. mirjam

Reply to
mirjam

Not exactly, Mirjam. In order to enjoy the fun of stitching, I need to look forward to seeing the finished product. One of the things I enjoy looking at is "eye candy"; which is how I describe Alberto Vargas's pictures.

Reply to
F.James Cripwell

I tgought it was just the quality of the ART that attracted you, Jim! ;-)

Pat

Reply to
Pat P

Jim , I am a bit puzzeled by both your answers ,,,

  1. I really have no idea why your gender should restrict your embroidery subjects. Beauty is to be found in many subjects, not only in those you call Candy for the Eye.
2 Why not try a male nude and see what beauty you can find in working on something else. This might be a Good creative Stimiulant to you . mirjam
Reply to
mirjam

Mirjam wrote Jim , I am a bit puzzeled by both your answers ,,,

  1. I really have no idea why your gender should restrict your embroidery subjects. Beauty is to be found in many subjects, not only in those you call Candy for the Eye.
2 Why not try a male nude and see what beauty you can find in working on something else.

Beauty truly is in the eye of the beholder, and one sees that very quickly by reading different posters talking about what they love. And we have had lots of discussions over the years about people who work for technically perfect stitching , people who enjoy changing patterns, people who enjoy reproducing them exactly, people who just like the act of stitching, people who love samplers, or angels......Jim is doing something he likes to do, and I say good on him even though I would never stitch something like that , since I think it is all about enjoying what you do. I would likely never stitch a nude, male or female, just because the repetition of lots of close colours would bore me, but some people might enjoy the challenge. Dawne

Reply to
Dawne Peterson

I know exactly why Jim likes stitching his ladies: the same reason I'd stitch nicely naked gentlemen (*if* I had the stickwithitness to complete one, that is).

For mine, I'd stitch a representation of 'The Dying Gaul' or of the famous chieftain, Vercingetorix. Both statues can be seen depicted on this site:

formatting link
course, Michelangelo's 'David' and Rodin's 'The Thinker' are obvious favourites as well, but the Celtic connection is a strong one for me. A simpler alternative might be a nude Asterix with vine leaf tastefully affixed...

Reply to
Trish Brown

Mirjam,

I think we are puzzled that you don't understand why Jim wouldn't want to stitch a male nude. Heck, I wouldn't stitch a nude at all, but I can certainly understand why Jim enjoys it.

It all comes down to some of us like abstracts, some like florals, some like to stitch people or animals. We stitch what we enjoy, and we don't want to deviate from it.

take care, Linda D. in B.C., Canada

Reply to
Linda D.

I think it might be a question of stitching for leisure vs stitching for art. Most of us here stitch as a pleasant relaxing pass-time, so we stitch what we enjoy. If, however, one sees stitching as a form of creative artwork, then one would feel pressed to push ones creative boundaries. They are two different motivations and sometimes people with one of those motivations have trouble understanding and being respectful of people with the other motivation.

Elizabeth

Reply to
Dr. Brat

Amen to that.

A lot of my stitching is for gifts. If using a laying tool (or some other technique) doubles the amount of time it takes, then I'm probably going to miss the occasion. So, I don't use them. And have yet to have any recipient complain.

The only competition I've ever entered is the Customer's Choice one at LNS, where no one checks to see if stitches are laid, knots on the back, etc., it's all about showing off what you've done that may attract someone else to buy the chart.

I don't like samplers (though I'll stitch one on occasion if it's the perfect gift). I like my MLIs and Silver Linings, which are works of art, I'm not so keen on the folksy stuff and primitives, though, again, for the right sentiment, I'll stitch it as a gift.

Reply to
Karen C in California

SPLORT!!!!!

MargW

Reply to
MargW

By Tutatis! I am sure that Asterix the Gaul would be be delighted to pose Bruce

Reply to
Bruce Fletcher (Stronsay, Orkn

InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.