>This is true.
>I thing is that since I got my bird in 1991 I have changed my mind about
>keeping birds captive. At that stage it was fashionable/romantic to
>have a bird, and even today people are envious when they see I have a
>parrot. My brother also has a parrot, but that one seems perfectly
>content to live in his cage. Mine wasn't, which is why I gave her the
>opportunity to free herself if she really wanted. The first time she
>flew away I was EXTREMELY upset, and worried, and then she came back.
>Now she doesn't show that desire to get away any more, just enjoys being
>able to get out of her cage and "chat" to the people walkng by.
>
>What I find so inspiring about what happened is that it embodies that
>ideal: If you love something, set it free. If it comes back to you,
>it's yours, if it doesn't, it never was.
>
>I certainly won't ever get another one. I think birds, as with other
>wild animals, belong in the wild. I certainly don't criticise other
>people for having them, though, as I can understand the reason for >wanting one. >
>Catherine
Your parrot presumably is a native bird ? In which case all is not lost if it strays. In another country if it strayed further afield local wild birds can put an end to it.
It's the same as if you had a cat/dog which strayed away, some can live but others are in extreme peril. Vics pet is a miniature size and I imagine there are plenty of larger birds to mob it in Texas, plus the colouring allows it no cover.
Sometimes freeing something from captivity, even though it appears it wants freedom, is signing a death warrant.