a dreaded sewing question ?

my wife ask me a dreaded question the other day.

A man at work wants to know what i thought of the new singer portables because he was thinking to buy one for his mother for christmas because she likes to go to those quilting conferences and quilting retreat/get together/meetings etc. and *he* wanted something light and portable for her to carry.

well, i could respond as i only knew how.

he should ask the mother what machine(s) she would love to add to her collection ? or what machine she would love to carry to a quilting conference ? or best drive her to a shop and let her pick one out ?

I suggested the new singer portables are not well respected and she might easily prefer a vintage Featherweight over a new portable machine ? The machines all have varying dispositions, personalities and will need to decide which personality she likes.

any other things i might mention ?, rob

Reply to
robb
Loading thread data ...

The Singer 301 is a relatively undiscovered gem for quilters on the go. It uses the same bobbin case and bobbins as the FW, is light-weight, even more portable as it has a built-in handle. It weighs a couple of pounds more than the FW, but is a full-sized machine with lots of room for fabric under the arm. These machines are often found in cabinets of the usual Singer variety, but instead of being hinged in, have a quick-release lever that allows you to pick up the machine by the handle and head out the door. It's also a slant-needle machine, which is great for finicky work as you can see the needle much better. The stitch is the same as the FW, a beautiful straight stitch.

Reply to
Pogonip

You about covered it. :) Good job. A while back a bunch of us here put our heads together and wrote an FAQ about which sewing machine to buy. Penny S. is gracious enough to give that a home on her site. Here's a link

formatting link
You might refer him to that page. My very best suggestion is for him to take her shopping for the machine. You definitely gave a very good answer.

Sharon

Reply to
mamahays

Well... I've discussed this before several times, but I can say it again! :) Singer do some excellent machines and some that are a disaster! Knowing which is what is the key...

About two and a half years ago I bought my mum a new Singer 117 Featherweight II (now superseded by the 118). FOR THE MONEY, it's a very good little machine. Stitch quality is good, it has a useful handful of utility and decorative stitches, and my ONLY dislike of it was the needle threader (THE ONLY built in needle threader I've ever had any time for is the one on my Bernina 1150MDA serger! That one works!). It's light, it's small: don't expect the penetration power of a full sized Husqvarna or Bernina, or an old singer 66. It's a bit bigger than the old featherweights, and about the same weight as the old one without the box. For quality of stitches on quilting cotton, I have to say this little thing matched my Featherweight, which is an excellent example built in about 1954 or so... Having more stitches makes it more versatile. AND it was half the price I see those going for!

Another one I quite liked was the Frister & Rossman Cub SP. That too is a neat little machine with good stitch quality. I also hear good things of the Janome Gem.

I don't say these things lightly: I have several old black Singer machines and my Husqvarna Lily 550, plus a nice Bernina 1005. The Singer 117 compares well on stitch quality on fabrics it can handle. DO NOT try to feed it denim or curtain fabric, or Polartec 300!

Best that your friend takes his mum out to try them all out and see what SHE likes!

Reply to
Kate XXXXXX

Yes Kate, I agree - what is it with these supposed time-saving needle threaders.

My recent machine is a Singer. I like them most of the time, but cannot for the life of me get the built in threader to work :-(

Katherine

Reply to
jones

Reply to
Emily Bengston

for

conferences

wanted

add to

and

dispositions,

the go.

light-weight,

couple of

of room

cabinets of

a

the handle

is great

stitch is

Thanks for reply Joanne, but if we are going to talk about the 301 should we also mention the 404 ?

but then again there is no handle on 404

thanks again, rob

Reply to
robb

for

us here put

to buy.

Here's a link

thanks Sharon, i will pass that link along robb

Reply to
robb

for

say it

a

it's a

useful

of it

ever had

works!).

a full

bigger than

one without

say this

example

more

That too is

good things

Singer

The

handle. DO

see what

Thanks Kate for all the ideas, Sounds like Singer portables could be a possibility after all, well that is if the Mom likes.

thanks again for your time to reply and all the ideas, robb

Reply to
robb

The 404 isn't so portable, although it can be put in a case and called "portable."

Several of us here have 401s that we consider one of the best sewing machines ever made, and we use them. They're solid metal, have that fantastic stitch quality, and also have a good assortment of zig-zag stitches. It's our experience that we use straight stitch the most, a simple zig-zag second, the blind-hem stitch third, buttonholes probably fourth - and the 401 can do all of these things. Plus there are some "cute" decorative stitches and a true two-needle stitch.

When you bring up the 401, others may chime in because we love our 401s.

Reply to
Pogonip

Ding, ding, ding...

Just chiming in here...

Beverly, another devoted 401A fan

Reply to
BEI Design

InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.