Calling Clothing Historians

Someone posted that she wore pants, not skirts and dresses - Juno? It got me to thinking. Thought you smelled wood burning, didn't you? ;-)

Men in trousers and women in dresses seems contrary to anatomy. If I am recalling correctly, it is also a relatively new way of dressing. Greek and Roman men didn't wear trousers. Egyptians, either. Seems that they wore skirts, kilts, robes, or some other such garment. Not just in Western Civ., either. In Asia, men wore various garments, but not trousers. I think leg wrapping came in when Europe was being conquered, perhaps because of the cold weather? Or the wooded terrain? Even today, men in kilts is not unusual. Some churches have men in robes of various kinds. Women in Asia wear pants in some cultures. The salwar kameez suit comes to mind. As do "harem pants."

Do we have an historian on board who can shed some light on the history of "modern dress"? Where did we go wrong and why? Men in trousers fussing with their fiddly bits, and women in dresses must have an interesting past.

Reply to
Pogonip
Loading thread data ...

Well, part of it is easy, and comes from whether a particular society was an agrarian or hunter-gatherer one.

Hunter-gatherer societies make most of their clothing from skins - and anyone who has ever sew with leather knows that you get lots of smallish odd-shaped pieces. Logically, you sew them together to fit your body. You end up with close-fitting garments. Even when you get cloth traded in, you go on making the same kind of stuff you are used to wearing.

Contrary to this, weaving textiles is a loooooooong and laborious process. After you have spent all that time putting together a piece of fabric, the last thing you want to do is CUT it! So you drape it, seam it, pin it, and do other stuff to it, and you get robes, chitons, kimono, and other stuff like that, worn by both sexes.

Not as sure about some of the later developments, as they are pretty culturally and religiously specific - about what is and is not appropriate for the genders. The "no trosers for women" seems (at a wild guess) to be more common in Christianized societies, where people got really hung up on men and women dressing differently - because God said it, you know? {Apparently, the Hindus and Muslims weren't listening hard enought ;-) }

I DO know one little tidbit about women not wearing "pants". Women did not even wear underwear beneath their skirts until comparatively late in history. This is not just for convenience (just squat where you are to pee) but for hygeine. Remember, the garments next to your skin weren't washed too often. Neither were you. So you needed to...er..ventillate the area. Wearing cloth that trapped moisture there was just ASKING for trouble. (can we say "raging yeast infection" boys and girls?)

Reply to
zski

Dear Wendy,

The Iceman (Oetzie) wore trousers, as did the Bog People, both older than the Greeks and Romans. But your reasoning about woven cloth is quite good. They had no needles fine enough to sew the fine cloth. And it "wore" better, because each day the pieces would be draped a little different.

The Romans and Greeks (at least the upper classes) had running water and public baths. Some even had flush toilets!!! It was the Europeans and later the Americans who didn't bathe or have water systems.

Underwear for women became popular in the 1820s, and was made of fine linen or cotton. The first versions were made to show below the skirts, and did little to cover or protect the private parts. In fact, pantaloons were no more than two leg tubes held together by a waistband. I have read, but never seen in a historic collection, that some women of the Regency period wore tubes tied to their knees so it looked like they were wearing the new-fangled pantaloons.

Teri

Reply to
gpjones2938

When were scissors invented? Imagine trying to cut woven fabric with a knife -- even with the new rotary cutters, curves are difficult to impossible, and they're probably finer and sharper than the old knives.

Reply to
Pogonip

The Iceman and the Bog people who wore trousers - were they animal skins?

As for running water, the natives in Mexico also had it, and bathing was common and frequent there and in the more northern areas. What was it about the Europeans and their aversion to water? No wonder they invented perfumes!

Reply to
Pogonip

formatting link
(paste together the following URL:)
formatting link
shows some Egyptian shears from about 1000 BC -- they looked rather like hand sheep shears

Kay

Reply to
Kay Lancaster

G'day

If you practice cutting curves with a rotary cutter they do become easier, although I do tend to use the 1" cutter for tighter curves and prefer using a rotary cutter to scissors for a neater, more accurate cutting line.

We have it so much easier now than they did many years ago.....we are truly spoiled......I don't think they were the 'good' ole days.

Br> zski wrote:

Reply to
HC

Wonder how large they are. They do look more like clippers or shears that require two hands to operate, though.

Reply to
Pogonip

The story I read was if the Heathen, beginning with the moors, I believe, bathed then "good Christians" just didn't need that new fangled stuff, We'll just embrace Dirt and disease. LOL thus the dark ages, y'know?

Reply to
Kitty In Somerset, PA

The replicas I have are five inches and nine inches long. They look like primitive shears, with one hole large enough for four fingers, the other hole for the thumb. They're black. I can use them like modern shears. In fact, we made a replica of a quilt made by the Boone women in 1860 because the original was in very poor condition, and had to go to the conservationists at St. John the Devine in New York. We used these shears to cut, just to get the "feel" of how it would have been to use such tools. It turned out that they did a very good job. (The Daniel Boone Home belongs to the University for which I taught, and I was its conservator and curator as part of my duties.)

Teri

Reply to
gpjones2938

Bingo! There were no "good" ole days. Some were better than others, but the progression has definitely been toward improvement for a long, long time. It's the old "When looking in the rear view mirror, times may look better than they were."

Reply to
Pogonip

Reply to
sewingbythesea

A whole lotta years ago, I got some obsidian blades in Mexico. Just picked them up off the ground, actually. They were also sharp. The long edges were flaked leaving a very sharp edge.

Reply to
Pogonip

LOL Not as dark as once thought.........

Reply to
Arri London

G'day Linda

No........sorry not the same one.

Br> Is this by any chance the same Bronwyn who's from Lancaster PA and is in the > SCA?

Reply to
HC

I have heard that the Englishman who invented the toilet was named Crap, hence the nickname for the toilet "Crapper", but don't quote me on that. Most of ours are 2 holers. Hillbllly Dot in Tennessee

Reply to
Scare Crowe

In article , Scare Crowe of WebTV Subscriber uttered

A flushing water closet was invented by Thomas Crapper.

Reply to
She who would like to be obeye

Close, but no cigar:

formatting link
" Claim: The flush toilet was invented by Thomas Crapper Status: False.

... Much of the confusion stems from a 1969 book by Wallace Reyburn, Flushed with Pride: The Story of Thomas Crapper. Reyburn's "biography" of Crapper has often been dismissed as a complete fabrication, as some of his other works ... are obvious satirical fiction."

Beverly

Reply to
BEI Design

In article , BEI Design of uttered

formatting link

Reply to
She who would like to be obeye

InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.