We have worn out 'Art versus Craft', at least for the time being. To further waste your time how about reviving another old and useless debate? I mean "What defines a Professional Woodturner or separates him from a Hobbyist"? It's not as simple as it looks, is it? The work of some professionals can be amateurish. A hobbyist's work can be very professional. etc. etc.
In my dictionary there are several definitions of a professional that seem to overlap both hobbyist and professional woodturners. Do terms like 'learned endeavor', 'expert', 'code of ethics', 'for financial gain', 'livelihood', 'long, intensive preparation' 'full time' apply only to the professional and rule out the accomplished hobbyist? Nope.
I thought I had found a definition or a reasonable understanding that works for me, namely that a hobby is a pursuit outside of one's regular occupation engaged in for relaxation. But suppose that a 'hobbist who sells is retired or has no other occupation? This would apply to an amateur turner as well, although there is a sense of lack of experienced competence in the term 'amateur turner'.
For those who sell and call themselves hobbists, I ask why? For you who consider yourselves to be professionals, how do you separate yourself from accomplished hobbists who are retired or have no other occupation, and sell a few birdhouses at the local flea market?
Of course the separation may not be distinct and only relates to the degree of time spent turning and money made, but at what degree is the difference apparent? Forty hours a week? Five hundred dollars a bowl? What's your take? Please respond, even if you don't care. Orphan posts even silly ones, are not much fun.
I've about decided that having a printed business card makes one a professional. But suppose the work is amateurish? Here we go again. Maybe he's an artist. Oh no, he's a craftsman, although his work is amateurish art. In the end I reckon you are a professional or a hobbyist (or a redneck) if you say you are. Who cares. :)
Turn to Safety, Arch Fortiter