Leslie G got it right. For most of us, rcw is both educational and entertaining. For now I'll ignore whatever else it may be.
What entertains this ng varies with the person and his/her breakfast. Some love to engage in or precipitate disagreements or even dog fights. Others enjoy doggerel, bathroom jokes and broad puns. Some try, and succeed or not, for true comedy (yep, all very autobiographical). Our educational posts are more clearly defined. They seem to divide into "this is the way I do it or I think it is or it should be" versus "this is the way things are and have been proved to be". I'm musing about the latter. What are your ideas for increasing rcw's already existing importance to woodturning?
RCW is loaded with a group of talented and knowledgeable people who are good teachers and know how to relate their particular expertise to woodturning. I wonder if we fully use this pool as a contribution to the craft? We have metallurgists, chemists, physicists, engineers, machinists, artists as well as experienced turning experts who can teach. I am a list maker and the list goes on.
I have a vague and poorly thought-out proposal for your thumbs down, or if thumbs up, ideas for a more balanced and useful ng, At intervals, have a planned no-nonsense in-depth seminar type thread chosen from a prepared list of subjects not well covered by the usual woodturning sources. Open to all, but expressions like " I disagree", "In my opinion", 'I've heard that", "It works for me" would be discouraged. Distracting cute asides or even serious diversions from the topic wouldn't be encouraged, either. Leave :)'s for our frivolous fun posts, which we ought to have and enjoy without guilt. However, rcw does have some obligation to its charter. People who know a given subject should be the contributors to these threads. Archived, these threads would be an authoritative collection of subjects for woodturners, but not about turning wood. Confused? Me too, but I mean a series of discussions re basic arts & sciences for woodturners: powdered steel alloys, chemistry of LDD, physics of motion & vibration, iron-acetate staining in detail, classic forms, welding, bending and machining steels, marketing, what makes lacquer glossy? and... making lists! All as additions to, not in opposition to the usual Q's & A's.
We've had these kinds of threads before, but they were sporadic and plagued with silly or abrasive diversions. Of course, serendipity can be a real plus, but tangents would be counter-productive here. I said my idea was vague. Maybe it's worse than that? Arch
Fortiter,