What species wood cheaply available in San Francisco in the 1920's?

My great-grandfather was a carpenter in Palo Alto California in the early part of the 20th century (in fact, he was in the 1st graduating class at Stanford University), but he hurt his back and had to quit. To keep his hand in he built a small lathe from scrap parts and wood. I have inherited the head- and tail-stocks, a couple of tools made from old files, and various attachments such as a sanding disk.

However, the ways and the stocks parted ways sometime in the distant past. I would like to make a pair of short ways to mount the stocks on, but I want to keep them period-appropriate, and want to use wood that was cheaply available in the 1920's. Most of the wood in the bits I have is redwood, which was cheap and plentiful in the San Francisco region then. Not now, though! Besides, I live in Seattle, and virgin redwood compares to tropical hardwoods in availability and price.

I could use Douglas fir (I have a bunch of old growth VG fir salvage), but was this wood generally available and cheap in San Francisco then? Or were other types of pine more generally available?

Ironically, I grew up in the Bay Area, but I didn't get into woodworking until I moved up to Seattle, so I never paid attention to wood when I was a kid. Should have, though. I do remember that the local lumber yard carried 4-foot-wide redwood shelving as a stock item.

Thanks for any help you can give.

scritch

Reply to
scritch
Loading thread data ...

I think redwood would be much to soft. Even clamping the tool rest banjo to it would dent it. Old growth fir would be much better, especially if you have some that is quarter-sawn.

Ponderosa pine might be more historically accurate (a guess), but if you want to actually use the lathe, the fir is better.

Reply to
Larry Blanchard

And to think I complained in another forum about someone using "to" instead of "too" - shame on me :-).

Reply to
Larry Blanchard

On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 09:17:57 -0700, scritch wrote: I was told that they took out several oak groves on the San Francisco Peninsula.... Oak was the preferred wood when strenghth was required....

Reply to
Mac Davis

I'd see if you can find a reclaim wood store - and maybe you can find some good planks.

Remember Redwood is considered a hard wood. Not rock hard. Most of old town San Francisco is Redwood in the buildings. After the Great fire and earthquake, they used Redwood from the San Lorenzo valley (near Santa Cruz) to rebuild. Massive sawmills shipped northward on barges.

A number of good sources might be on the west bay - Some of the old wood might have been parts of clipper ships and would be very good.

Martin

Reply to
Martin Eastburn

Redwood is brittle. Monterey Cyprus is available in the area and is strong. look for what is native.

Reply to
.

I'd rather turn Redwood than Fir anytime. Fir is a great building wood - strong beams. But the wood is 'stringy' and in short sections doesn't hold up.

I would never call Redwood Brittle. The wood is moist and holds moisture for a very long time. Shrinkage is nominal.

Madrone is a good turning wood - a bit tough to use in large sections. There is to much energy stored in the blocks - and they are normally twisted and bent.

I used to live in the mountains with acreage of coastal Redwood. I had sections of Madrone and Holly. I had a large holly cut down by the electric company (PG&E) and left where it lie. I was able to get some of the trunk and turned a number of 'cups' from 2 to 6" tall. I had a nice desk set to hold the paper clips etc of life.

I have furniture that is over 50 years old that lasted. I'm rebuilding some it it this winter - the legs sitting in the ground were eaten up.

Mart> >> I'd see if you can find a reclaim wood store - and maybe you can

Reply to
Martin Eastburn

Thanks all for the advice.

And as far as the oak, there is oak and there is oak. Most of the oak in the Bay Area is the local version of "live" oak, and while hard, is almost impossible to make lumber out of. It twists, cups, splits, checks, etc. Better for firewood.

I would have tried to get some reclaimed redwood (4 x 10 x 12 feet!) from my brother, but the guy who was storing it at my brother's house took it back to make a floor for a tree house. What a waste. At least I got one piece last year to make a two pieces of furniture from.

scritch

Reply to
scritch

InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.