Free Motion Quilters....

Oh yes, so it is! They must have changed something around the foot of the 6600 that the 6500 didn't have. Still have to locate a bobbin holder though - thats for either.

Sally at the Seaside~~~~~~~~~~~~~uk

formatting link

Leslie& The Furbabies > I bought the free motion bobbin holder and that foot with the small

Reply to
Sally Swindells
Loading thread data ...

The 6600 has the even feed (Accu-Feed) system- similar to a built in walking foot. It's great to use! But my machine does need different feet from the

6500. Hope you can find the parts you need.

Leslie & The Furbabies in MO.

Reply to
Leslie& The Furbabies in MO.

The 15-91 is a lovely old Singer that stitches beautifully. I have a 1950 model Singer 15-91.... the year I was born.

Leslie & The Furbabies in MO.

Reply to
Leslie& The Furbabies in MO.

DH has just seen me looking for suppliers and told me that he has already found one and DD is getting me a Bobbin Holder for Christmas. Fortunately he didn't tell her about the foot - apparently the 6600 is a long shank and the 6500 a short one - but he had me worried for a minute.

Now I'll have to practice the surprised look!

Sally at the Seaside~~~~~~~~~~~~~uk

formatting link

Leslie& The Furbabies > I bought the free motion bobbin holder and that foot with the small

Reply to
Sally Swindells

Instructions for Using Singer Electric Sewing Machine (P. G. Built-on Motor) 15-91 Reversible Feed Oscillating Shuttle for Family Use

I think that they also made the 15-91 as a treadle machine, but don't quote me on that, because sometimes I misremember stuff!

I want to give the working parts of this machine a good cleaning and oiling before I sit down to really sew. It is a black beauty! Her original owner will be 90 y.o. next week.

Bonnie, in Middletown, VA

Reply to
Bonnie Patterson

I just looked it up:

It is a Model 66, 15-91, serial number AG922924 and was made sometime after July 23, 1941.

"AG- 071551, 096550, 66, 25000 were issued on July 23, 1941. The serial number is AG922924 and falls in the Model 66 range."

I have to say that I am older than this machine, but I do have a featherweight and two 99Ks that are older than me!

There were 25,000 of this model made and many have been scraped. S/Ns were assigned in groups as above.

Mom bought it in the mid to late '40s, she got married in 1944, has a daughter born in 1945, son in 1951. She sewed clothing for all but her husband, they were married for 60 years.

Bonnie, in Middletown, VA

Reply to
Bonnie Patterson

Howdy!

I bet it would; this Janome has some instructions in the manual about quilting by machine - *gasp* - but I just haven't felt the pull to do that, yet. ;-P Love this Janome 6500; her Memory is better than mine.

R/Sandy - Felicitous Mistress Quandary

Reply to
Sandy E

I think quilting a pattern that has corners with a walking foot is something you do once, or never. I came up with an allover pattern for a quilt that respected the block design and would enhance the overall design etc. but having not turned any corners with a walking foot, didn't include that in my planning and found that it really is a nightmare and that quilt is folded up, unfinished in the cupboard!

Anne

Reply to
Anne Rogers

Hi Bonnie,

The 15-91 has the potted, or 'built-on' motor, and inside is what's called a 'worm gear.' It's a is direct-drive (no belts) which makes it a very strong stitcher, but as such also required electicity, so it was never available as a treadle.

However, there were a number of other Singer 15 models without the potted motor that were available in other 'forms, ' such as treadle, handcrank, or with the belted motors that were located on the back side of the machine, with an exposed belt from the motor to the handwheel....such as the 15-30, 15-88 and 15-89. I have a lovely

15-88 that was a native treadle, it was given to me a couple of years ago (I know - lucky me! The machine and treadle base are beautiful.

I also have a beautiful 15-91 with the Centennial badge - it's drop dead gorgeous and what a stitcher.

Singer 15s' are probably the most prolific models out there and were cloned by many other companies.

-Irene

Reply to
IMS

Well, before I knew better, I made three quilted vests that I quilted the pattern in the fabric. Ribbons, bells, trees, I quilted around them all, with my walking foot!

Then I learned that it couldn't be done with a walking foot!

Really?

Bonnie, in Middletown, VA

Reply to
blpatterson10

Irene,

What great info, in my former life I was a Mechanical Eng., I was in station maintenance, with an electric Co. I loved it.

But, I have loved machines all my life, spent my childhood following my Great-grandfather and Dad around getting into and under mechanical things, old cars/trucks, tractors, etc. Mom never could get the dirt off of my hands.

So now I'm into sewing machines, I haven't taken many apart yet, and yes I can put them back together, but only if "I" took it apart!

I just went to the living room and took a close look at that machine, and I see the motor housing, you are right, it's not a motor hung on the back with a drive belt like all the rest. Very interesting, I used the machine at Mom's but I was sitting in front of it, didn't pay any attention to the motor. Now I'm going to have to clean and oil it and do my next quilt on it! The cabinet top is curly maple! Damn, what you see when you pay attention! I'd start on it right now but Ruffles has to go get her lime disease booster shot!

Did you notice that the singer manual is a sewing instruction manual? Tells you how to use all of those odd looking feet/attachments that used to come with the machines as standard equipment. Now you have to buy them for the new machines, and they have ridiculous prices!

Thanks again for the info Irene, Bonnie, in Middletown, VA

Reply to
blpatterson10

Thanks Leslie! :-)

Michelle > The 15-91 is a lovely old Singer that stitches beautifully. I have a

Reply to
Michelle C.

That is just so very cool, Bonnie! :-)

Michelle > Michelle C.,

Reply to
Michelle C.

Yes, Anne, it IS--especially with a standard size harp. Still, I'm determined to finish it as the quilt is a gift for a friend. Even though I pretty much despise doing the quilting, I am mostly satisfied with the effect, so it keeps me going. The quilting design is nothing fancy--especially compared to what FM quilters can do--but it's okay.

Michelle in Nevada

Reply to
Michelle C.

Needle down facilities helps heaps with this.

Sally at the Seaside~~~~~~~~~~~~~uk

formatting link

Michelle C. wrote:

Reply to
Sally Swindells

Yes, I can see that Sally. I've started looking at sewing machines online. I can see why everyone raves about her Janome 6600, and if money was no object..... I'm seriously considering the Juki TL98Q, but have more research to do.

Michelle > Needle down facilities helps heaps with this.

Reply to
Michelle C.

I have one of those too, Anne. It is simply small floral squares - quite pretty. I decided I would hand quilt each square about ¼" inside each seam line. Hard to do. Boring. I get it out once a year and make a little progress. Thank God for cupboards. Polly

"Anne Rogers" found that it really is a nightmare and that quilt is folded up, unfinished in the cupboard!

Reply to
Polly Esther

Oh but hand-quilting is SO pretty Polly! Maybe we need to work a trade--I'll handquilt for you and you can FMQ for me. ;-) Only problem with that is no matter how enthusiastic I am about hand-quilting, it still takes longer to do than FMQ. You wouldn't be getting the fair end of the deal.

Michelle in Nevada

Reply to
Michelle C.

Howdy!

Yes, she would. Handquilting vs machine quilting- it's not about speed. ;-)

R/Sandy

Reply to
Sandy E

Well true, Sandy, hand-quilting is definitely not about speed. Both are quilting, but may be it's apples and oranges.

I've got a 92" square quilt I'm hand-quilting at the moment. I doubt I'll get it done this winter before the weather becomes too warm to hold it in my lap.

Michelle in Nevada

Sandy E wrote:

Reply to
Michelle C.

InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.