Foulmouthed Craftweb rant

There is another message board, Craftweb, where I had a recent dispute with the moderator. The moderator posted some accusations and then didn't allow me to respond. If anyone has been in that position, you know how frustrating that is. In fact, he reffered to this as, "a foul mouthed rant". I really am sorry to have to engage in such a silly maneuver, but its the only way I could respond to the guy. I'm sure this is futile, and admittedly childish, but it gives me a bit of satisfaction to know my response is on the record somewhere.

"Your drop shipping dichroic doesn't amount to a "favor" to anyone. Given the CBS pricing strategy it allows YOU to buy wholesale at a better price. Which is typical from you. I simply informed CBS I would be buying 25 sheets. Its not a big deal, I need the writeoff.

Lets face it, this is all about you, your little power trip. The fact is not that I like to argue, but that you're uncomfortable with disagreement. Hell you managed to ban or drive off all the Republicans on the board. Yes, I do like Bob Stephan. I always have. I don't like his politics, no. But He's a cool guy. Original ideas, great intelligence and technical knowledge, and just look at his site to see that he has a sense of humor. What you really want to have here is not a discussion group, but a gentlemans club for people who'll share similar opinions and voice them at a safe distance. To me, that's chickenshit.

About my work, when you came to my studio you were LITERALLY hopping up and down on one foot and saying, "no one's doing anything like this", and asking me to sell you stuff for your gallery. When I balked, you said you would produce it yourself. When you got back, you reported on Craftweb that you had had an epiphany on the beach. Remember that Pete? I know Mary Beth does. I bit my tongue. But that was a bitter pill, I can tell you. I can only imagine how many other people's work you've ripped off. For anyone who has actually talked with you privately, they know you are really about making the cash, art be screwed. And of course as Shute has pointed out, the private Pete is considerably less scrupulous than the public Pete. I wish I had recorded that whole story about how you invited other artists to your studio and told them the wrong materials to use.

In fact, your whole deal with being a moderator in the first place was ripped off from Shute, and really, he has an arguable position in being pissed off. I agree with Bob. I think your are completely unsuited to this position. You use it to pump up your products, your financial aims, your view of the world, and of course your own shall we say, 'unique' view of thermodynamics. And you do all this not from a goal of proselytizing a notion, or an ethic, but from your own petty interests and insecurities.

A MODERATOR is supposed to moderate. As in, moderation. To be even handed, aloof, resolve disputes, etc. A moderator is not supposed to be injecting his/her opinion into the debate at every opportunity. And if they do, they are certainly not supposed to use the power of their position to reinforce their own view, which at that point really becomes precisely antithetical to the whole principle of moderation and moderating. The elephant in the room at craftweb that no one really talks about, is that you aren't a moderator, you are an OWNER. You own the forum, and in order to keep in good with the landlord, people don't complain about the sh*t that keeps backing up in the john.

What Craftweb should really have is a rotating moderatorship or an academic moderator. If, this was really as professed, a place for learning. I suggest you ban me, because I'm not stepping into line in the way I know you want me to.

Bob Stephan is the moderator at the Glass Art Society board. You can post if you buy a membership. I never really saw a reason to join before. But, I have seen the evolution of glass boards from when there was only usenet. Frankly, I don't care for where we've ended up, with sponsorship and unilateral control by one individual. I think at this point I feel much more comfortable with a "society" being in charge. So, I will leave Craftweb to go to the GAS board. I think there is much more potential there for an unvarnished exchange of glass info.

Reply to
David W
Loading thread data ...

Having followed the small tiffs and riffs and arguments for several years on Brad's board, and then over to the CraftWeb forum, I must say, "it is about time somebody spoke up."

Not knowing any of the group personally or privately, but only watching what they type, the replies and comments made, it just sounded like a "good ole boys" club.

I miss the Newsletter out of Vermont that was published/printed 4 times a year, by David, before all the internet stuff and personalities and possessive attitude.

I blow glass for me, and give it away if I feel like it, sell it if I feel like it and depend on another job with glass to earn a living and pay my bills. In that I am fortunate, but I tired of all the childish rants and attitudes of CraftWeb long ago.

I "left them with their toys" and found nothing more interesting about it.

Thank you, David, for making mention of the Glass Art Society board.

Reply to
Javahut

[snip] I think at this

Javahut, I just checked out the GAS forum and it's still so new and cold and empty. I hope some GAS member (who therefore is allowed to post) will advise the webmaster to jazz it up a bit: avatars and inserted pix, if possible. At present it seems to be a tiny collection of hesitant whispers from a few Seattle glassblowers. No fusers, no coldworkers, no artists. Well, maybe that's what GAS has become.

And will someone please tell them to drop the forum classification of "International". People who can read and write English should all be interested in each others' info, from all over the world.

C.C.

Reply to
Carol Cohen

Most of the boards that I am familiar with (3) do have a core group of contributors who's names become familiar, present company included, but it has been my experience that some of those "regulars" do contribute some very sound advice and make cogent observations for all participants and lurkers, present company included. As an aside the GAS board is as close to zero as a board can be and I think Ms. Cohen is correct, the GAS board represents what GAS has become. It is easy to take sides in a dispute and lose sight of the pearls of wisdom that do get posted now and again on these internet boards. My only suggestion is that just because David has a conflict, and "spoke up", with the moderator does not mean the Craftweb board is worthless or because you felt it was about "childish rants and attitudes" that that is what we should believe or that is what transpires over there. At one time, and that is long ago now, that criticism did fit the CraftWeb but under the present moderators stewardship it has grown into board that does contribute excellent advice to the glass community as does this board and I would say with minimal to almost non existent rants and attitudes. It really is not in anyone's interest to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Reply to
Henry Halem

[snip] I think at this

Yeah, I'm not sure what happened over there. I looked at it about two months ago, and there were a whole bunch of posts. Now the format has changed and apparently Bob Stephan isn't the moderator anymore. Or if he is, there's no mention of it.

I've seen a bunch of glass boards start up, and go down. What they really need is to have people go over there and start sharing their experiences. I hope the whole glass message board phenomenon keeps evolving to end up at a good healthy place.

Reply to
David W

Well, GAS was always primarily hot glass and that mostly furnace glass. Cold working isn't discussed here either. Warm glass showed a rise in GAS with the Tucson GAS Conference, but that area was strong for it. I get on CraftWeb and a lot of good people are there. I really like it that most of the stupid stuff ends up in a separate category and that stuff is maintained by subject so that if a discussion gets rotten, I can ignore it, unlike boards where everything has to be waded through. I would be just as happy if avatars and funny faces went away although being able to post images is nice.

Reply to
Mike Firth

I agree with the baby and bathwater thing, I have seen alot of information posted, far more than I could have gleaned from reading alone in any other place, and quite honestly, until today I have not been there reading in a very long time. Just didn't care for it. After David W's posting here about that board, I went there to see what had changed, and with the exception of that particular thread, there is alot of good information there, and the postings seem to have a lot more going for them than when I left it. Given the fact that "I" wouldn't want the job of moderating anything, and personalities being what they are, where everyone is different, and in an artistic vein, there are individual conflicts bound to crop up, that appears to be what has happened in this instance. For me to say, as I did, what things were like over at that board, when I hadn't read it in a while, probably was not fair, to anyone. So I did spend today, reading and digesting a few threads there. I found most of it informative, and educational, far better than I recall it a year ago, but the thread that was written about to start this thread here was leaning backwards, like two guys that make a line in the sand and both know ahead of time they are going to stand as close to it as possible and by doing so will piss the other off to know end.

As long as those are the only two getting wet, it suits me just fine, there is alot of information that can be learned when not standing in the sand.

Reply to
Javahut

I agree with most of what you say. I think a good online message board for glassworkers is a boon to our work on many levels, and one of the few really great things about this new computer age. And, I would never suggest that Craftweb doesn't have *extremely* valuable information and contributors. But as I said, this is an evolving process, and I think we might continue to work the bugs out. I know I have been working for that ever since I really moved from usenet to private boards.

I have had more than a few conflicts with moderators over the years, and they virtually always stem from issues of commercialism and marketing mixed in with genuine advice. Message boards have come to be viewed by their owners--and that's what they are, owners, not moderators--as primarily if not wholly marketing devices for products. And I wish we could iron that out. Like I said, academic control by an institution, or a grant run board would be my preference. The other thing is, being an "owner" of a discussion group (bizzare as the notion is, that's where we are)really requires the person make a huge effort to control the tenor of their own input. What has happened over at Craftweb is really a situation of bullying people with out of the click ideas--political or otherwerwise. Sadly its easy for people who may agree with the perspective of the bullier, to overlook that behaviour. If there is one thing I think we have all experienced from our guilds and our organizations, is that its not healthy to give one person unilateral control over issues that affect our work.

The other thing that top

Reply to
David W

I also wanted to add, my post above is EXACTLY the post that was removed from Craftweb by the moderator; with the exception of adding an asterisk to the word sh*t, and replacing with "screwed" a less moderate term. In deference to George Carlin, I couldn't bring myself to astericize 'screwed'.

The moderator is claiming I edited the post for republication here, after I deleted it myself from Craftweb. That is absurd, and a lie. What happened was, Craftweb has an edit function, and I had two other paragraphs in the original post that were shall we say, Mammetish. A bit later, and before it was deleted from Craftweb, I cooled down and edited those out. But again, the post is exactly how it was when it was deleted from craftweb by the moderator.

I'm really not here to start a flame war. As I said I felt a desire to respond to smears about me that the moderator had made to my friends and peers.

Reply to
David W

Mike, coldworking has definitely been discussed here (check the archives). But I do agree with you about eschewing those adolescent twitches called emotikons. However, setting an avatar of a photo of oneself is a useful communication tool, in that we all could find it helpful to have an idea of the face that goes with the words. On a non-Usenet forum I'm on (different subject) I use a tiny photo. What DO all these glass-arts people I read here, look like? After all, (I've observed) glass artists seem to be notoriously below-average in looks, compared to other artists. Maybe we can choose to lie and represent ourselves as the top (Billy M.) or the bottom (Dale C.) -- "Nobody knows you're a dog on the Internet".

C.C. (woof woof)

Reply to
carolcohen

I know Carol Cohen. She's a babe. No woof woof for her. What's an avatar?

John Bassett

Reply to
Baswolfe

carol, see what happens when you talk to guys about things like that? You would get no end of relentless suitors if you put a picture of y'self on the board!!! 'Course maybe that's not a bad thing! IT just might be difficult yo get them to focus on glass. m

Reply to
Michele Blank

carol, see what happens when you talk to guys about things like that? You would get no end of relentless suitors if you put a picture of y'self on the board!!! 'Course maybe that's not a bad thing! IT just might be difficult to get them to focus on glass. m

Reply to
Michele Blank
  1. John, you KNOW I'm fat and 65. Anyone wants to see a picture (me biking), check out my web site.
  2. An avatar in the dictionary is an embodiment of a concept as a person, but in computer forums it seems to be either a photo of oneself or of one's work or favorite pet etc.; something that one chooses to represent oneself visually.
3.Yeah, OK, Michele; focus on glass, but keep us from falling asleep at the keyboard, bored. Like at the GAS forum. C.C.
Reply to
carolcohen

OK, I tried your link, its dead, so I googled your name, HA!! which Carol Cohen are you? Dean at Brown University? Head of the Dept of Social work? Dept. head at Galludet Unuversity?

Given the topic, just had to know, will the real Carol Cohen please stand up.

And I resent the comment previously made "(I've observed) glass artists seem to be notoriously below-average in looks, compared to other artists."

I have no idea where you have observed this, but personally I am rather dashing and I like me just fine!!

Reply to
Javahut

Oops! My website seems to be down! Gotta contact my webmaster! But meanwhile you might continue your detective work by googling "Carol Cohen" and "glass".

You forgot to mention Carol Cohen the NY raincoat designer. And the Texas photographer. I may have to revert to my maiden name to avoid becoming the recipient of an honorary doctorate in something sociological.

I will accept your assessment of your looks as above average for a glass artist.

C.

Reply to
carolcohen

Oops! My website seems to be down! Gotta contact my webmaster! But meanwhile you might continue your detective work by googling "Carol Cohen" and "glass".

You forgot to mention Carol Cohen the NY raincoat designer. And the Texas photographer. I may have to revert to my maiden name to avoid becoming the recipient of an honorary doctorate in something sociological.

I will accept your assessment of your looks as above average for a glass artist.

C.

Reply to
carolcohen

Aha! A routine search for "Raines" has revealed that my own mother is intriguing on the web. After all those times you told me to get off the phone and do my homework... Anyhow, you're forgetting Steve Tobin, an amazing artist and fine-looking fellow to boot. Hi to all in the glass forum menagerie... Annie (meow fffft)

Reply to
paulandannieblues

Carol - it was back up when I checked

do you know Sid Hutter????

I believe he is near you - and you both use "stacked" glass techniques. I knew Sid when we were still "young college kids" ... LOL Cheryl DRAGON BEADS Flameworked beads and glass

formatting link

Reply to
Cheryl

techniques.

Yes indeed, everyone working in glass in the Boston area knows mild-mannered Sid Hutter. (Actually he's mellowed out a lot, folks.) Cheryl, I'll write to you directly because I'd love to visit your website first.

As for the rest of you, my website is indeed up and you may search through it for the teensy photo of me that relates to the part of this thread I instigated, to wit: the lack of beauty of glass artists. Carol Cohen

Reply to
carolcohen

InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.