commercial manufacture of lenses and mirrors

I tried posting this on sci.astro and got no replies. Maybe this is a better place to ask.

Books on amateur telescope making emphasize that machining lenses and mirrors is prone to produce astigmatism, whereas hand grinding lenses and mirrors tends to randomize errors and thereby avoid stigmatism. On the other hand, I haven't heard any complaints about astigmatism in commercially ground lenses and mirrors, and I doubt very much that they are ground by hand.

So, what I would like to know is this: what are the machines and processes used by commercial manufacturers of telescopes and what book explains them in detail?

Ignorantly, Allan Adler snipped-for-privacy@zurich.ai.mit.edu

****************************************************************************
  • *
  • Disclaimer: I am a guest and *not* a member of the MIT Artificial *
  • Intelligence Lab. My actions and comments do not reflect *
  • in any way on MIT. Moreover, I am nowhere near the Boston *
  • metropolitan area. *
  • *
****************************************************************************
Reply to
Allan Adler
Loading thread data ...

It isn't. And it wasn't the last time you asked a telescope question, either.

Why don't you just contact the commercial manufacturers and ask THEM?

****************************************************************************
*
*
*
****************************************************************************

If you aren't as you say anywhere near Boston, whyinhell are you posting off a MIT server? Too cheap to get an ISP of your own?

Reply to
Moonraker

I'm beginning to understand why so few people post to this NG. If this is the greeting you get...

Try posting your question to rec.crafts.metalworking, with a "OT" in the header. The place is full of knowlegeable people who are willing to discuss just about any topic.

-- Bill Browne

formatting link

****************************************************************************
****************************************************************************
Reply to
Bill Browne

You have a great point there Bill. The last and only time I posted to this group until now, I got a number of really uncalled-for replies and a few which actually solved my On-Topic question about cutting lubricants for glass. Interestingly the few replies I got of value were direct e-mails. It appears that there a number of knowledgable lurkers hanging around. I certainly don't condone spamminga NG but I didn't find this question all that offensive espcially when this is a lean NG. The one you mentions gets hundreds of posts daily and you are right they do try to help even OT posters (sometimes ad nauseum)

Best regards, Charles

****************************************************************************
****************************************************************************
Reply to
Charles A. Peavey

You don't like it? Tough. Use your fillfile.

Reply to
Moonraker

****************************************************************************
****************************************************************************

Thought top posting in NGs was for newbies?

Geez Charles, you really hold a grudge, I had to go back a ways to find that thread, 11/2003, and your question was answered in the 2nd post after by jk Sinrod, did you want more answers or different answers? The rest was just friendly jabber, total waste of bandwidth, really, but friendly all the same.

and sometimes a post just rubs the wrong way, like this one obviously did. Next thing you know, you'll want to know how to make things in glass "perfectly flat" , oops, answered that one already way back in November.

While admitting sometimes saying nothing is better than responding to some posts, some days folks (me?) just get up on the wrong side of the bed and feel like letting off a little steam to a post that seems to be asking for it.

Too hot here? Oh well.

Reply to
Javahut

You might want to ask on the ATM mailing list:

formatting link
better yet, search their archives first:
formatting link
John

Reply to
John Sutter

Go to the site for the Mirror Lab at the University of Arizona which makes huge cast glass mirrors and ask them.

Reply to
Mike Firth

"Top posting"?

-- Bill Browne

formatting link

stigmatism.

astigmatism

****************************************************************************
****************************************************************************
Reply to
Bill Browne

The intelligent response I was expecting....

-- Bill Browne

formatting link

Reply to
Bill Browne

You'd have to have a functioning brain before you could discern an intelligent response.

Reply to
Moonraker

I actually have a good impression of this NG and have been posting sporadically here for a long time. In the case of my question about commerical lenses and mirrors, I've gotten a few helpful answers and I appreciate them.

Sincerely, Allan Adler snipped-for-privacy@zurich.ai.mit.edu

****************************************************************************
  • *
  • Disclaimer: I am a guest and *not* a member of the MIT Artificial *
  • Intelligence Lab. My actions and comments do not reflect *
  • in any way on MIT. Moreover, I am nowhere near the Boston *
  • metropolitan area. *
  • *
****************************************************************************
Reply to
Allan Adler

The part that amazes me most, is that you really don't realize what a pompous ass you are being. Or maybe you do. It's easy to talk big when you're hiding behind a computer monitor.

You talk to your customers the way you talk to people on this NG?....You'd starve to death.

-- Bill Browne

formatting link

Reply to
Bill Browne

You think?

Little do you know.

Reply to
Moonraker

InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.