Crystalline glaze tests on extruded tubes

Oct 25, 2026 Last reply: 13 hours ago 4 Replies
Jump to replies (4)

Most crystalline work you see aims at big, repeatable blooms on classic vessel forms, so a set of zinc silicate tests on extruded tubes already reads as an unusual direction. The maker works exclusively in crystalline glazes and has done so for a good while, and rather than showing a finished piece, the focus here is on two fresh tests pulled from the kiln the night before, fired to cone 10.



The recipes are worth noting. The first test runs a full 413 base with plenty of manganese, at 8 or higher, plus some iron. The second is a 413 and 3110 hybrid carrying more 413 than the maker normally uses, while the manganese dioxide stays at 10 or below in both. These same colorant percentages have been in play for over a decade, which gives the results a solid baseline.



The surfaces themselves look lovely in two very different ways. One tube carries a glossy dark reddish-brown glaze with fine speckles and large circular blooms. The other shows glossy honey-amber and caramel brown with round formations and bow-tie-shaped crystals. On the darker piece, a golden-brown band edges the upper rim where the glaze thins.



The open question is the strangest and best part: ghostly halo-like ring reflections showing up near the rim in the lighter brown zone, visible only when the light catches them just right, sitting over specks that show all the time. The cause remains unidentified, and the maker's own guess that the extra 413 might be promoting it is still unconfirmed. That mystery is a nice hook for anyone who enjoys glaze chemistry.


The boldest choice here seems to be the manganese level. From what the maker said, manganese crystal glazes supposedly run around 65 percent manganese, while these tests sit at 8 or more with the dioxide capped at 10. Pushing it that far below the expected range and still getting large blooms looks like a genuinely interesting trade to study.

I am curious about the second test tube. What exactly went into that 413 and 3110 hybrid, and did it fire to the same cone as the first one with the full 413 base? I would like to know how much the two recipes actually differ before comparing their surfaces.

That has been answered. Both tests fired to cone 10. The first uses the full 413 base with manganese at 8 or higher plus some iron, and the second is a 413 and 3110 hybrid with more 413 than the maker usually uses. The manganese dioxide does not exceed 10 in these tests.

Since the higher 413 content promoting the halos is only a guess so far, a clean follow-up would be a third test identical to the second but with the 413 pushed even further. If the halo rings intensify, the link is confirmed; if they fade, the effect points elsewhere. Either result would sharpen what is currently an open question.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required