A disappearing spool quilt from just twelve blocks

Oct 17, 2026 Last reply: 5 hours ago 3 Replies

Rate this thread:

BrassHank95 3 days ago

What surprised me most is how little fabric and piecing this takes. The whole lap-sized quilt, 39 by 52 inches, comes from only twelve blocks built from six fat quarters plus one and a quarter yards of white fabric. For a design this bold, that feels like a very efficient use of materials.

The build starts with positive and negative Grecian Square blocks, one of each from every fat quarter. Each block pairs four half square triangle units trimmed to five inches with four bar blocks from strips two and three-quarter inches wide, plus a five-inch center square in white or dark fabric. Then comes the disappearing step: every pieced block is cut into four equal quadrants, and two of those quadrants are rotated so the triangle points face the center. That rotation is what produces the diamond spool motif, and arranged in a three-by-four grid the finished spool blocks measure 13 inches square.

The details that stand out to me are the secondary effects. Blocks placed one way leave a white spool shape floating in the negative space, and a second layout alternates the block angles to create circular rings around central diamonds. Graphic slides show monochrome versions in twelve and twenty-four blocks along with red, white, and blue variations, which suggests the design scales in interesting directions.

One thing worth knowing: the standard version has a slight seam offset where the triangles meet the bars. An alternate version fixes this with four-and-a-half-inch unfinished HSTs and bars cut from two-and-a-half-inch strips, finishing at 12 inches instead. In my view, having both options documented is a smart, practical touch. A printable pattern is available through the newsletter.

Project by Brita Nelson the Questioning Quilter. Watch it on their YouTube channel:

formatting link

Vote

KnotMeadow_1960 3 days ago

The quadrant rotation is the clever bit for me. Cutting each finished block into four equal pieces and flipping two of them so the triangle points face the center turns a fairly traditional Grecian Square into something that reads as spools and links. The trade-off shows up in the seams, though, since the standard version leaves a slight offset where triangles meet the bars. The alternate sizing removes that overlap but costs an inch of finished block size.

Vote

RavenRunner 2 days ago

How does the assembly actually start? I follow that a five-inch square gets cut from the remaining fabric after the large square, and that printed and white strips are sewn lengthwise, pressed, then subcut into four bar blocks. What I am less sure about is the HST step. I understand an 11-inch square paired with white fabric produces eight half square triangle units. Is the trimming to five inches done before or after pressing the seams open?

Vote

Ash_Pine 2 days ago

For anyone wanting maximum secondary patterning, I would suggest trying the alternate all-negative layout first. Since the finished top here uses batiks in blue, orange, pink/magenta, green, and purple on white, picking one strong color family for every negative block could push that white spool shape in the negative space even harder. It would also sidestep the seam offset by using the four-and-a-half-inch unfinished HST version, keeping the clean look of the rings layout while staying quick to piece.

Vote