As mentioned in response to Arch's latest Musing, I have been ruminating on the use of materials and so on. What started this was a picture of what appeared to me to be four weedpots in the Readers Gallery of the Jan/Feb Fine Woodworking. These "poplar vessels" are completely black with the exception of some "ribbons and dots of white acrylic sheeting to create a sharp distinction between artificial materials and natural elements". The poplar was flame treated because it "provides a rich, warm, black tone that can be difficult to achieve with stains or dyes".
- Art - interesting, but - to me - not spectacular.
- Craft - look well formed, very slim (3.5" by 15"), consistent, and the acrylic work must take some real effort.
- Weedpots - all four have what appear to be weeds in them. When does a weedpot become a vessel?
- Materials - the picture is quite small (2.5"square - including the weeds) and might not show the wood properly, but it certainly looks like they could have been created in glass, pottery, or even acrylic. Brass might be good, as brass can be chemically blackened quite easily. Very difficult to see any distinction between artificial materials and natural "elements".
So, why use wood? Is it just a canvas? Why tell anyone what material was used for the canvas? If it is intended as multi-media, does the object lose something if you can't tell one media from another?
Did Michelangelo paint his sculptures?