I let some time go by before posting this as a separate thread so as not to shed more heat and less light and not to wander farther OT from JD's OP re "Feedback desired". OPs and OT responses often spark disagreements on this open forum, but "manners maketh man" .....and a decent forum for everyone.
Since rcw's inception there have been threads, pro & con re far eastern products assembled and branded by North American companies as domestic products or sold intact under a brand name. Many (most?) products woodturners now use are included and it's only my take, but I see no wrong in Tom expressing his opinion re this situation.
I know that I'm off base in deploring our dependence on imports unrelated to woodturning and I shouldn't air my personal concerns. However, due to a shutdown of the one and only source worldwide (happens to be a Canadian reactor, but could be anywhere) of parent isotopes there is currently a worldwide shortage of nuclear isotopes used for diagnosis and treatment of serious diseases. ex: cancer patients dependent on P32 cannot get it. All this is OT unless you have a myeloprolific disease or have lost your USA job. Certainly it's against all rules for this turning group, but "it's the bit dog that yelps" so I impose on the ng.
Any argument has two sides and this one sure does. I agree 100% that it should be our choice to buy imports vs domestics, but it's becoming 'Hobson's choice' as the relative quality of imports rise and relative prices for them fall. As domestic products become scarce and/or unaffordable there really is no choice for most of us. IMHO, the problem is the dependence, not the origin.
Thanks for your tolerance. Sorry if this irritates some of you, but whether or not you agree with Tom and me, we may not be too far OT for a woodturning group.
Turn to Safety, Arch Fortiter