Melinda Meahan - take out TRASH to reply wrote:
What would be handy is if more designers were very explicit about the rights they were granting, and more are becoming explicit as they themselves gain greater awareness of copyright law. The point is that if you want to know what is absolutely, positively permissible, it's to stitch one copy as directed from the chart. That's absolutely solid ground, even in the absence of clear direction from the copyright owner. Once you step beyond that, either making changes (such that you're creating a derivative work) or making multiple copies, then you're in a gray area. The copyright owner has the *right* to prevent you from doing any more than that. Most designers don't intend that limited a license, but they *could* if they wanted to. So, in the absence of a clear statement from the copyright owner, you either have to make a judgment call yourself or ask the designer. Asking the designer is always the safe route. Making a judgment call entails some risk, though many calls are very low risk. Making multiple copies for personal use is very unlikely to be a problem, but getting to the point where you're mass producing them almost certainly will be a problem. Keeping it yourself or giving it as a gift to a friend is very unlikely to be a problem, and maybe not even putting it in a charity auction, but selling them by the dozen is almost certainly over the line. Making a few changes is extremely low risk, but using the design in a completely different way without permission might be more than the designer is willing to tolerate. Hanging it in your home is not a problem; hanging it in a gallery might possibly be, particularly if you've stretched the limits of your rights in other areas. Note also that in the case of licensed characters (like Disney characters and such), there are additional limitations.
Best wishes, Ericka