OT Seasonal Humour continuing the series of past and new humourgrams about the Holiday Season

An engineer's view of Santa....

There are approximately two billion children (persons under 18) in the world. However, since Santa does not visit children of Muslim, Hindu, Jewish or Buddhist (except maybe in Japan) religions, this reduces the workload for Christmas night to 15% of the total, or 378 million (according to the Population Reference Bureau). At an average (census) rate of

3.5 children per household, that comes to 108 million homes, presuming that there at least one good child in each.

Santa has about 31 hours of Christmas to work with, thanks to the different time zones and the rotation of the earth, assuming he travels east to west (which seems logical). This works out to 967.7 visits per second. This is to say that for each Christian household with a good child, Santa has around 1/1000th of a second to park the sleigh, hop out, jump down the chimney, fill the stockings, distribute the remaining presents under the tree, eat whatever snacks have been left for him, get back up the chimney, jump into the sleigh and get on to the next house.

Assuming that each of these 108 million stops is evenly distributed around the earth (which, of course, we know to be false, but will accept for the purposes of our calculations), we are now talking about 0.78 miles per household; a total trip of 75.5 million miles, not counting bathroom stops or breaks. This means Santa's sleigh is moving at 650 miles per second -- 3,000 times the speed of sound.

For purposes of comparison, the fastest man-made vehicle, the Ulysses space probe, moves at a poky 27.4 miles per second, and a conventional reindeer can run (at best) 15 miles per hour.

The payload of the sleigh adds another interesting element. Assuming that each child gets nothing more than a medium sized Lego set (two pounds), the sleigh is carrying over 500 thousand tons, not counting Santa himself. On land, a conventional reindeer can pull no more than 300 pounds. Even granting that the "flying" reindeer could pull ten times the normal amount, the job can't be done with eight or even nine of them-Santa would need 360,000 of them. This increases the payload, not counting the weight of the sleigh, another 54,000 tons, or roughly seven times the weight of the Queen Elizabeth (the ship, not the monarch).

600,000 tons traveling at 650 miles per second creates enormous air resistance-this would heat up the reindeer in the same fashion as a spacecraft reentering the earth's atmosphere. The lead pair of reindeer would absorb 14.3 quintillion joules of energy per second each. In short, they would burst into flames almost instantaneously, exposing the reindeer behind them and creating deafening sonic booms in their wake. The entire reindeer team would be vaporized within 4.26 thousandths of a second, or right about the time Santa reached the fifth house on his trip. Not that it matters, however, since Santa, as a result of accelerating from a dead stop to 650 m.p.s. in .001 seconds, would be subjected to acceleration forces of 17,500g's. A 250 pound Santa (which seems ludicrously slim) would be pinned to the back of the sleigh by 4,315,015 pounds of force, instantly crushing his bones and organs and reducing him to a quivering blob of pink goo.

Therefore, if Santa did exist, he's dead now.

Reply to
CATS
Loading thread data ...

I have never allowed facts to distort my opinions. I believe. Polly

Reply to
Polly Esther

Darn straight!

Santa is magic, math is not.

NightMist totally believes >I have never allowed facts to distort my opinions. I believe. Polly >

Reply to
NightMist

~cut~

I was married to an engineer 34 years ago for 18 months.........no explanation is now needed as to why I not only didn't stay married, but never remarried. *sigh*

Val

Reply to
Val

Yeeha! Now we know what to send Val for Christmas. Let's all send her our husbands. Every one of them is likely to commit some unpardonable offense sooner or later, and Val's just bound to like one of 'em. You know, kinda like sending Pami our uglies. For obvious reasons, engineers are not acceptable. Those of you married to engineers must endure until we think of something. Polly

"Val" wrote > I was married to an engineer 34 years ago for 18 months.........no

Reply to
Polly Esther

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply to
Val

I still believe in faeries - always have - and angels who never go away.

Reply to
Maloney Empire

Val's just kidding, y'all. Go right ahead and send them. For example, if one of your husbands asks, "Do you really need ALL of these Christmas boxes down from the attic?" or "Did you buy That on purpose?", send him to Val. Polly

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply to
Polly Esther

I'm with Val. Sorry to those married to "nice" engineers, but an early relationship with a pedantic analytical nutter of an engineer (very short lived I might add) may well have contributed significantly to my own single status now!

roflmao

The world needs a little magic! Not everything has to be explained, although I do sometimes like to know "how". But I worked with so many engineers in the Air Force (many of them very nice people, and a few of them women) I did see the funny side to the joke. I cannot count the number of engineers who have looked at a quilt, calculated how many pieces there are in it, estimated (quite accurately sometimes) the time to sew all the pieces together, and then looked me straight in the eye and asked "Why?". I usually responded by asking why they spend their weekends in the mysterious backyard shed or garage, as most of them never actually produced anything substantial from their "tinkering". They would then walk away muttering "you wouldn't understand" or "it's not the same thing at all".

Reply to
CATS

Definitely a "keeper"!

Reply to
CATS

InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.