OT: update on deliquent "client"

So she calls this afternoon to ask (laughing while she's asking) if I actually got in touch with my attorney. WHen I told her that I had and what his advice was, she threatened me by saying that if I decided to pursue legal action, she would make sure that it took even longer for me to get my money. Then she made the mistake of saying, "look, Honey," to which I responded, "Listen, little girl." Ken took over the conversation at that point because he knew I was getting ready to let loose on her obnoxious butt.

Ken talked to her for quite a while and after he got off the phone, he said that they had agreed that she would give her brother $5 a week until the amount was paid off. The first week that she didn't give money towards her bill, we would be submitting paperwork for small claims court.

Now, given past history, you know and I know that she won't pay, which means that I have to go through sending her a certified, signature required letter and give her 30 days to pay. After the 30 days are up, I have to file at small claims court.

DH came up with the idea that if she gets the dress back to us (in decent, clean condition) that we can list it on ebay and whatever we can get for it will settle everything. He said that if we get over the amount she owes, then we would give her the extra money. The bride thinks I should keep all the money because she never paid me for it in the first place. I agree with her...I made the dress for her to be in her brothers wedding, she never paid, the dress was never really hers, therefore, why should *I* give *her* any money??

Anyway, that's where we stand....there's another post with the picture...will try to get a better one, once the actual pictures are received (this was from an email that I was sent).

Reply to
CNYstitcher
Loading thread data ...

I'd list it on ebay *and* file in small claims court. I am a bit surprised that you let a garment go before it had been paid for...but I guess we all have to learn that lesson once. ;)

gabrielle

Reply to
gabrielle

She sure wouldn't get any of the money I got for the dress if it was me. It never was her dress in the first place as you stated, plus all the trouble you are having collecting anything. I think I'd get paid when an order was picked up from now on. That's not an unreasonable request at all. It's sad to say but folks you can trust with anything having to do with money are few these days.

Reply to
Dixie Sugar

I have two clauses in my contract, under the Fitting, Collection & Payment heading, that say:

  1. Payment in full is required before the garment(s) may be collected or dispatched.
  2. Payment for fabric ordered on your behalf must be made upon placing your order (in addition to the deposit).

This gets signed BEFORE any work other than the initial consultation takes place.

Reply to
Kate Dicey

You should check into that arraignment. Once you agree to accept installment terms the rules change. You might just be out there on that limb much longer. Learn from the error, never, never, did I mention never let a product out the door without payment in full. Dead beats are dead beats and they know more angles than you ever will. I also agree with Kate first off you should have a signed contract that outlines what will and what will not be done, when and how payment is demanded and all things pertinent to the transaction. I am sure you can have an Attorney draw up something that will cover you in most all situations. Good luck and off to small claims.

Reply to
Ron Anderson

In article , Dixie Sugar of Posted via Supernews,

formatting link
uttered>She sure wouldn't get any of the money I got for the dress if it was >me. It never was her dress in the first place as you stated, plus all >the trouble you are having collecting anything. I think I'd get paid >when an order was picked up from now on. That's not an unreasonable >request at all. It's sad to say but folks you can trust with anything >having to do with money are few these days.>I'd be inclined to let all those nice people at church ... where she works ... everyone else ... know what a little cow she is.

Reply to
She who would like to be obeye

Reply to
Hoosier_Rose

"She who would like to be obeyed once every Preston Guild" wrote

That's awfully tempting isn't it? However, it's also highly illegal in the States. Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, a creditor is not allowed to talk to anyone other than the debtor regarding a debt. That goes for anyone trying to collect any money from a specific debtor. Larisa is within the law talking to us all here about it because she hasn't stated the girl's name. Now if she posted the girl's name, that would be ag'in d'law. ;)

Sharon

---who spent 3 years working for a collection attorney and had to read and sign off that she'd read the FDCPA annually.

Reply to
mamahays

You don't think a picture would get her in trouble?

A
Reply to
Angrie.Woman

All of this trouble for $86 worth of materials?

....let...it....go....not worth the headache!!!!

ps

Reply to
small change

In article , Angrie.Woman of SBC

formatting link
uttered>>You don't think a picture would get her in trouble?>

Well, I reckon lookin like that on *anyone's* wedding photos is a crime ...

Reply to
She who would like to be obeye

Darlin' - come on down and clean this monitor!

Reply to
Kate Dicey

InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.