Mostly OT: The Height of Pettiness?

Sorry Caryn--I had no clue she was talking about you. Lucille

>
Reply to
Lucille
Loading thread data ...

The lady name Jill from AOL messager

I want to run something by the folks here. I'm trying to figure out if what this woman did is just the height of pettiness, or if I'm seeing something more than what actually is there.

I told you all about the insane accusations made about me by a former AOL chat host, Jill. She claimed I'd said some things about her that were truly vile and totally outside of my personality to say.

She kept claiming she had been contacted by someone on the internet, or a long time online buddy, or several people, the story kept changing. The one thing that would not change was that she refused to believe anything but the nasty lie. Any attempt on my part to try to reason with her was deemed me "playing games" and "trying to be clever."

Ok whatever, nothing I can do if she chooses to be like that right? I made it clear that I would still be coming to chats on AOL because I do have friends there and I wouldn't allow her to drive me away. I told her I had her emails blocked, so that she couldn't harass me via email any longer.

I'd said two weeks ago in the chatroom, that with my work schedule the only chat I could now make it to was the Friday afternoon one.

Here's the part I'm needing feedback on.

Last Friday morning, she sends out an email to select people who come to chat. It announces that she won't be using the old chatroom, and gives out a link in this email to the new private chat room. For those without AOL, private chatrooms are just that, nobody can see them or those in them, nor can they enter without the link.

Obvious, I didn't get the email, and it didn't end up in my spam folder either, unlike some other emails she sent. Clearly she'd taken the time to remove my name from her usual mailing list.

Now, am I being paranoid, or is Jill actually being as vindictive and petty as I think she is? I don't want to believe she'd go that far to try to cut me off from my other friends in chat. And yet, I can't help but think she's attempting to do just that.

I'm sure some here will jump to tell me I am crazy or "need therapy" but I'd like some feedback from people who take a moment to think about it.

Thanks!

Caryn

Reply to
faerydragon

"she" was not. But you would know that if you knew how the References header worked. Suits you not to, I would offer?

Reply to
clark krunt

What the hell made you so paranoid? Do you really think everyone is out to get you?

I rarely, if ever, responded to your notes before and you can be assured, I never ever will again.

Lucille

Reply to
Lucille

huh? wtf !

^shrug^

Reply to
clark krunt

I don't believe he/she/it has ever posted before, at least under that name. I *do* believe he/she/it has invented an identity to get around those of us who filter his/her/its real name. No matter, he/she/it is now in my killfile.

Reply to
Karen C - California

different shades of grey is the only variance between you and your tormentor.

Reply to
clark krunt

how about you take a flying leap up your ass. Now there is an invention! An asshole sew chocka with assbugs there is no room to pass! LOL

Reply to
clark krunt

Actually from the name--dark kruant (yes I know it's really clark kurant) I actually think they are playing troll to stir things up.

Some >> I rarely, if ever, responded to your notes before and you can be assured,

Reply to
Dorsey

[...] fx'd the gits top-post

wrong. No banana!

wrong. No banana!

cute *and* wrong. No banana!

have another go Dorsey. Step right up, only a dime a ball. Take your best shot to win the prize.

Reply to
clark krunt

Yeah, that was my thought, too.

Reply to
Karen C - California

stop it before you hurt yourself. And drop the excessive sigfile u r cluttering the place up!

Reply to
clark krunt

Speaking to me, not about me. The "she" in question was a woman I knew from AOL chats.

Caryn

Reply to
crzy4xst

That one`s infesting our local NG too - and other too, most likely. There should be some law against unsupervised psychiatric patients being allowed near computers!

Pat P

Reply to
Pat P

The troll did have a point about some really cluttering sigs tho! rofl

Caryn

Reply to
crzy4xst

You have qualifications in digital diagnostics? Thought as much. Qualified at guessing and digitally reaming - yourself.

Reply to
clark krunt

oh lookee here. It is the tail of the dog. Best you busy yourself settling the Milkos invoice, before your laigs give out or ya tail falls off from excessive wagging.

Reply to
clark krunt

ROFLOL--you know if you had any it just might be worth my time.

Reply to
Dorsey

"Dorsey" , paid out the line with.

You would never know. With a gob the human equivalent of Palo Duro you are in no danger of ever grinding "chin nuts". Or being accused of speaking with your mouth full ! Your attempt at "gender validation" does not fly. Try again. Get outside of what you do do as "cleaver" [sic].

Reply to
clark krunt

On this NG? Lots of oversized nonsense on AOL (does anyone really need a sig that's in larger, brighter type than the message?) and EzBoard (do you honestly think I give a rat's behind how old your kids are, or how long it is until your anniversary?), but here?

Reply to
Darla

InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.