I've recently been through an appeal transcript where (allegedly) one side was systemically removing all the jurors who shared ethnicity with the defendant, apparently thinking his own people wouldn't convict him.
One of the concerns was that the well-employed white people who were being left on the jury wouldn't understand that he was only robbing stores to feed his family because he couldn't get a job due to discrimination; he was happy with these repeated little $500 heists, it wasn't like he was trying to get rich quick with a $50,000 bank job. !!!
I must be an old stick in the mud, because I remember when men without jobs didn't get married and make babies until they were employed and could afford to support the wife and kids. So I guess I would've been tossed off that jury, too, for not understanding that holding up stores is a good thing when it's just a "job" that keeps your family off welfare.