Bindings without any hand sewing- a solution?

Feb 06, 2007 14 Replies

I may be re-inventing the wheel here, but... VBG Recently, we had several threads about applying bindings without hand sewing one side of the binding in place. I have been trying to think up a method for this. Here's what I came up with:



Make your quilt top, sandwich it, quilt the thing, trim the backing and batting, square up the corners, straighten the sides, etc. just like you always do. (*IF* your corners are square and your sides are straight after quilting the thing and you like the "plump" binding look, you could leave the batting 1/4 in. to 1/2 in. larger than the quilt to "fill up" your binding.) Make your double (folded) binding- bias, crosswise or lengthwise grain as you prefer. Line up the raw edges of the double binding to the raw edge of the backing side of the quilt with the folded edge towards the center of the quilt- as usual. Sew/baste the binding to the backing side of the quilt with a very accurate and straight 1/4 in. seam allowance using a water soluble thread in the bobbin and regular thread on top of your sewing machine- I'd suggest using a walking foot- as usual. Miter the corners and attached the ends of the binding together with your preferred method.



Then turn the quilt over to the front side. Start in the middle of one long side and turn the folded edge of the binding over the quilt edge so that it just barely covers the stitching/basting line. I wouldn't pin it since the pinning can cause some distortion- well, maybe very carefully pin the miters in the corners. Using your preferred, regular thread in the bobbin and top of your sewing machine, sew a straight or fancy stitch about 1/8 in. (or less???) from the folded edge. You should be able to catch both top and bottom sides of the binding evenly in the stitches. Dissolve the water soluble thread and then both sides of the binding will have a tiny bit of loose edge- the 1/8 in. from the edge where you did the stitching from the top side- and both sides should look exactly the same.... in theory!



Do you think this would achieve a neat, even binding on both sides without any hand sewing? Comments?



Leslie (with gnarled arthritic hands- hand sewing is very difficult for me) & The Furbabies in MO.



PS: Don't forget my little binding tip for fixing *slightly* wavy edges on your quilt. Make a double crosswise grain cut binding. Lay your quilt out flat. Use pins to mark any *slight* waves or wobbles- pin it where the wobble starts and where it ends. In those areas only- slightly stretch the crosswise cut binding to gather up the quilt's edge just a teensy bit. When the binding returns to it's original length the quilt edge should lay flat... or at least flatter than it was to begin with. This will NOT work on large waves or bumps, but it can really help with little boo-boos! You're welcome!



I do.

I think it's even easier to use Fusible thread in the bobbin. Sew, press the edge in place and then topstitch. No escaping or wiggling edge that way.

marcella

Using the fusible thread in the bobbin for the first round of stitching strikes me as scathingly brilliant. How I wish I would remember to consider that thread and the water soluble one for figuring out better ways to do things. Not too sure about using a fancy stitch for the final round. Sometimes the SM will bog down or stall trying to do something with a fancy stitch over multiple layers. You would want to do a test sandwich to make sure all of your adjustments would allow that, particularly at the corners. Ten points to Leslie for being able to spell gnarl. Polly

"Marcella Peek"

I bow down before the genius. Wow I'm glad you guys are out there, solving my quilty problems. Thank you.

Sunny

Suppose you put the binding on the top of the quilt, as usual, but using fusible thread in the bobbin. Then, press the edge on the back and SITD on the front... The stitches should not show very much and the back would all be caught!

-- Anita --

Eleabnor Burns/Quilt In A Day showed doing it this way some time in the last week or so on QNN. She sewed the binding to the front, pressed her miters in well, and then said stitch in the ditch on the front side with an invisible thread, to catch the backing on the back. Of course she didn't demo that part, just smiled and went on. I did wonder how that binding on the back would stay in place.... but that's just me.... fusible thread or maybe some spray baste???

Jan RCTQ Coffee Diva

I do bindings that way a lot, just folding them to the back as I stitch. I am careful to get them folded under far enough so they back gets caught in my stitching. Of course, I usually miss a couple spots that I have to go back over. I haven't tried fusible thread in the bobbin when I sew the the binding to the top; that sounds like that would help to hold it until the top was stitched, but I wouldn't trust it to hold permanently. I pin at the corners, but otherwise don't pin, either. I don't use invisible thread either; I just match my thread to the border fabric or the binding fabric. It blends in pretty well and is barely visible.

Julia in MN

I use this method, I really like the fusible thread instead of trying to pin the binding in place. Sometimes I use a zig zag stitch to make sure there is enough of the fusible to make a good bond, I tend to use mostly flannel backings on my quilts.

Judie in Penfield NY

Me too, Judie. If you're going to the trouble of changing to a fusible bobbin, you might as well set the SM on zigzag and get enough thread on the fabric to have a good bond. It doesn't have to be the widest zig possible and it doesn't have to be satin stitch, just a little 'more' than a straight stitch. Polly

"Judie in Penfield NY" wrote > I use this method, I really like the fusible thread instead of trying to

I love you guys!!! I'll have to get some fusible thread and try this. I too hate hand-sewing (in case anyone forgot).

Interesting idea. I just do a straight stitch since it only has to "stick" long enough for me to machine sew it down. Wonder if I could do a straight binding with a zig zag? Could be iffy for me.

marcella

Well sure you can. Play with it a bit until you are confident where the zig is going to fall and where the zag reaches over to. Your needle position at a pivot corner might be a challenge but you certainly could swap back to straight stitch there. Sometimes you must say to your SM, "No, that's not where we are going" and turn the handwheel as you put the needle where you say it's to go. The SM needs to know who is in control. Polly

"Marcella Peek" wrote >

Well that is my problem! Sometimes it just won't listen to me. Two weeks ago I was quilting merrily away and BAM big, fat, unappreciated ERROR message. sigh. I hope to have my sewing machine back in a week or so. It had to go home to the factory for repair. I wasn't being mean or anything but it just did what it wanted to do without my permission.

marcella

Well, yes, there is that. When my first Bernina had hundreds of thousand of miles on her, she took over. I would say 'straight stitch' and she might . . . and then again, she might choose to do a terribly cute rosebud or spell out a coded message. Polly

"Marcella Peek" wrote > Well that is my problem! Sometimes it just won't listen to me. Two

If she was that old perhaps she was going a leetle beet seenile?

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required