huh???

Feb 10, 2009 4 Replies

can anyone make head or tail of this info about the judging of quilts in a show here?



Baltimore Quilts are very much derived from older forms. Copying someone else's copy of an earlier and original quilt did not seem the same as copying a recent design, and these we decided to allow.



i've read that i dont know how many times and it makes no sense at all to me. what am i missing??? shrug, j.


Seems to me -- that it is saying that if you copy .... someone else's copy... of someone else's original (okay -- an 1880's quilt is copied in the 1950's and now you copy that one....) would be okay.

But if someone comes up with a new design... and you copy that ... it won't be allowed.

In other words -- I see it as you can reproduce an old standard... but you can't replicate a new design by a current artist.

At least that's my take on it.

oh, i see what you're saying. its all in how you pause and what words are emphasized. still seems weird to me tho. you'd think they'd be able to put in a bit more clearly. oh well. thanks for that, Kate. j.

"Kate in MI" wrote... Seems to me -- that it is saying that if you copy .... someone else's copy... of someone else's original (okay -- an 1880's quilt is copied in the 1950's and now you copy that one....) would be okay.

But if someone comes up with a new design... and you copy that ... it won't be allowed.

In other words -- I see it as you can reproduce an old standard... but you can't replicate a new design by a current artist.

At least that's my take on it.

another career possiblity down the gurgler then, eh. j. :))

"anthony in Clearwater" wrote... Written communication is difficult. Most people write the same as they speak, and that can lead to confusion without the pauses and intonations of human speech.

There's a reas> oh, i see what you're saying.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required