This is kind of a test message, as I am setting up thunderbird for reading news groups, and seeing if it is "better" than XPN newsreader.
Well, anyway, this video, from man sewing, one of my favorite you tube channels (perhaps I will do a future post about it):
There is also this video about how the Janome 2212 is the best machine for beginners:
This got me to wondering something that is sort of a hypothetical question for me, but might be more something that one of you has actual experience with.
Suppose you are teaching a teenager how to sew or quilt, and one day his parents come to you and say that they want to get him a sewing machine for his birthday, with you being the technical person, and them supplying the money, with a budget of up to $200.
Would you recommend an older machine such as a singer featherweight or
301, or a newer "beginner" machine like the Janome 2212 (the 2212 is not a "toy" machine, as I would never even consider a "toy" machine in this situation).I have a singer featherweight, which is kinda my "inheritance" from my late mother. I love it, and I have a buttonhole attachement for it which makes really nice buttonholes, and a bunch of presser feet for various things, of which I have only used the "regular" one and the 1/4" foot, but otherwise it is limited to straight stitching.
I also have a new home from the early 60's (I think), that is a really nice machine that is a zig-zag machine.
I would also like a singer 301, though I really don't know what I would do with a 3rd machine.
So if I were buying the machine for myself, I would choose an older machine, specifically a Singer 301. For the teenager, however I might not.
The 301 (or a featherweight) is probably the better built machine, as there is a reason they have been around since the 50's (I think), or, in the case of the featherweight, the 40's or earlier.
However, the newer machine, the 2212, has several advantages as well:
I have heard that threading the machine is a bit easier and more "foolproof" on newer machines, and I don't mean just threading the needle, though some newer machines have an attachment for automatically doing that as well. I mean getting the thread through the tension disks and the tension lever is easier.
Most general purpose machines today (and the 2212 in particular) have a freearm. I have never used a freearm, but I think they would come in quite handy if the machine was used primarily for garment construction. I don't think they would be very useful for quilting.
There is nothing new about freearms as there is a model of the Singer Featherweight (222) that has one, but I think the newer the machine, the more likely it is to have one, and a 301 definitely does not, I don't think. Heck, there might even be model of treadle made with a freearm.
The buttonhole attachement is probably easier to use than the one for the featherweight. The featherweight attachment makes really nice buttonholes, but I had a heck of a time getting it set up properly the first time I used it. The attachement for the 301 looks like it is similar.
The stich selection seems to be simpler on the 2212, and it contains several decorative stiches as well.
Obviously, a featherweight, since it is limited to straight stiching, has no decorative stiches. My New Home has decorative stitches, but you have to mess around with cams for that, and I have never used them except messing around with them to see what they look like, and the only one I might use is the one for blind-stitch hemming. If they were easier to use, though, I might. I don't know about the 301 and decorative stitches.
Many newer machines, though not the 2212, have a drop in bobbin, which I am told is easier to use than a front-loading bobbin. Winding a bobbin is still a pain in the royal butt (M*A*S*H fans might get that reference), so the availability of prewound bobbins for the machine you are considering might also be a factor.
There are probably other differences to consider as well, but those seem to be most of the advantages of a newer machine over an older one.
There are other, even simpler machines out there, but some appear to be too simple to go much past beginner level sewing. The 2212 looks like it could go well past beginner level sewing.
Brian Christiansen (I hope my name does not appear twice, as thunderbird is supposed to automatically attach it, but I am not sure if I have it set up correctly as it does not appear in the message I am typing.)