Re: quilting machine

I have a HandiQuilter with a Viking #1+, and a Brother ULT2001. Both machines have 7-1/2" throat space.

I did a 84 x 88 quilt with flannel top, Hobbs 80/20 batting and flannel backing on the Handiquilter. I also did a 58 x 64 quilt of regular quilt fabric and Hobbs 80/20 batting.

Both quilts were meandered. By the time you get to the middle of the quilt, you only have about 4" of space to work with. To not lose even more space, you have to start at the other end of the quilt and again proceed to the middle.

I wanted to do more than just meander on the next quilt. It was 65 x

74". The complex circular motif used for the blocks was 5.9" diameter so I could not use the HQ to quilt. I used the HQ to layer and pin the quilt and then used free motion quilting on the Brother. I could have put the quilt back on the HQ to do the border, but got so comfortable with the free motion that it didn't seem worth it to put the quilt back on the HQ.

The verdict: I would suggest getting a system that will give enough working room to do the largest quilt motifs that you intend to stitch.

The HQ16 might be an affordable system to look >Has anyone used a "home" quilting machine or fram (which uses your own

sewing machine? If so, what kind did you use and did you like it? thanks. >Arline
Reply to
rjwhite6
Loading thread data ...

Don't you have to worry about it poofing in the center when you start from both ends? (I'm not a MQer) I know you have to baste good, but would still thing basting would 'push' the quilt out (in this case, toward the center).

Reply to
LN (remove NOSPAM)

Since the quilt top and backing are on (separate) rollers, the (light) tension on the top and backing take care of this.

btw, with the HQ or similar baby quilting machines, no basting is required because of the rollers.

There are two good books out there about l>Don't you have to worry about it poofing in the center when you start from

Reply to
rjwhite6

Gotcha! Thanks for the clarification.

Reply to
LN (remove NOSPAM)

You're welcome. And thanks for the thank you. I've gotten a little discouraged lately.

I have replied helpfully to all lot of threads here recently with no acknowledgement or thank you. I know not to expect and to give freely but it is nice to know that people appreciate one spending their time helping when they could (should) be quilting.

I always try to remember to thanks other's efforts to help me.

Sorry for the m>Gotcha! Thanks for the clarification.

Reply to
rjwhite6

Different strokes.

While I wouldn't tell anyone NOT to say thank you, I prefer it when they don't. It gets boring. Questions are interesting. Seeing all the different answers is interesting. Learning why the original poster decided to choose a particular method or solution to a challenge (even if it is not the one I suggested) is interesting. Getting a follow-up on how my advice turned out (whether good or bad) is interesting. Reading 20 messages a day that all say thank you is boring.

I usually post a single follow-up message with a "thanks to everyone who wrote" at the bottom. That's as personal as I get. And everyone keeps jumping in to help me anyway. Go figure. Quilters!

--Lia

rjwhite6 wrote:

Reply to
Julia Altshuler

Reply to
Pat in Virginia

I am also interested in this. I have seen ads for a Grace sewing maching frame, and for a John (last name?) frame. The Grace one looks like you either move your machine (on some sort of wheels?) around the stationary frame, or the frame is on wheels. The John Whosit frame looks like you need five or six arms to coordinate frame and machine. Please educate me along with Arline.

Nell in Austin

Reply to
Nell Reynolds

Hi All, I don't expect everyone to thank me every single time I type something. I agree with Pat, Julia, etc.... When people ask advice, I prefer that they send a big "thanks" to all those that posted advice ( instead of typing about 30 replys, all saying "thank you" individually). Not me, but a lot of the people around the world ( on this newsgroup) have to pay for the messages individually. I can't begin to imagine how fast this would add up. So, saying that, I big "thank you" goes out to all that posted advice I found helpful.

Kris ( in northern Virignia)

Reply to
QuiltR1024

The Grace frame moves the machine and in my NSHO I think the Grace frame looks to be one of the best. I found in my research that the quilting limitations come from the machine and not the frame. If you want to quilt a 12" motif then the neck of the machine needs to be able to accomodate 12" plus the rolled up edges. That eliminates the standard home quilting machines that are being sold these days. The Nolting is just one of the machines sold that has an opening large enough to accomodate almost any kind of quilting.

Now, having said that, can the Grace Machine Quilter sm base accomodate a machine with a larger footprint? That is something I haven't looked into yet. Maybe someone else can help with that?

Reply to
Laurie G.

The Grace I tried out at the show had a Brother 1500, which has a somewhat larger throat. Not anything like a longarm, but noticeably larger than the average machine. It moved very easily -you could steer it with 1 finger. Didn't Frank buy that setup for Brenda? Brenda, have you tried it out enough to tell us about it? Roberta in D

Reply to
Roberta Zollner

Reply to
Laurie G.

Reply to
taria

Reply to
news.verizon.net

What is a "short arm machine"? I haven't heard of that yet! I've looked at the Handi Quilter & the Grace & so far the Grace has my vote, but I'm not anywhere ready for one yet. I'm looking forward to the big quilt show in October to see what frames are shown & demonstrated.

Reply to
Pauline O'Connell

Short arm is just the regular home sewing machine that we all have. Roberta in D

Reply to
Roberta Zollner

InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.