Potholders

Is it a technique that is sometimes used in patchwork/quilting type items?metimes

Reply to
FarmI
Loading thread data ...

Reply to
Pat in Virginia

Try googling "Overlapped Prairie Points" or just "Prairie Points":

formatting link

Reply to
FarmI

Thank you all very much for the pointers. I will give this a try.

Reply to
Steven Michael

I did, and found a tantalizing reference to "shark's-tooth border". Further Googling, alas, turned up lots of fossils and daylilies and knitting patterns, and an advertisement for a video, but no definition of "shark's tooth" as a sewing term.

Is "shark's tooth" another name for prairie points?

Joy Beeson

Reply to
Joy Beeson

Joy Beeson

Reply to
Joy Beeson

Dear Joy,

The only reference for shark's tooth that I know is an intricate process used in antique white work for undergarments. A tuck was made on the garment. The smallest I've seen is 1/4 inch. The tuck was then cut every half inch (for a 1/4-inch tuck), and the raw edges were then tucked and whipped closed. I did this on a gown for my daughter using 1/2-inch tucks, and I thought I'd never get it finished in time (I did).

Teri

Reply to
gpjteri

Similar, but not exactly the same. I found this definition and photo at Debbie Glenn's site:

"Shark's Teeth", a form of tuck manipulation, was popular in the 1800's. In this class students make a tucked fabric block, then clip and fold the tucks into triangles to create an elaborate design.

formatting link
in Alabama

Reply to
Doreen

No, it looks similar but is sewn by using tucks and is often used in heirloom sewing. Prairie Points uses individual pieces of fabric which are manipulated to form the point, then assembled and sewn into place. Teri describes Shark's teeth well in her post.

Reply to
FarmI

That's right! Prairie points/shark's teeth look the same to me, at least. I think it was on a Martha Pullen show that I became acquainted with prairie points and for a while, I added them as borders just above the hem to many of DGD's dresses. They loved them. Emily

Reply to
Emily Bengston

Dear Suzanne,

I experimented today, and found that I needed four pieces for the center, and eight pieces for the other two rows. I went to the website, and found that the trivel instructions used straight pieces instead of circles, which means that I can use my rotary cutter to cut them out. That will be a lot faster. Thanks for sharing the website with us.

Teri

Reply to
gpjteri

Reply to
Suzanne McHenry

Kate - thanks so much for the info about the Insulbright. I picked up two yards yesterday and almost have the first two potholders done; just have to sew a strip of binding along the edges.=20

This stuff is great!!

-Irene

Reply to
IMS

InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.