On another close (in time) thread Andrew asked some perceptive questions re online critiques. Victor and Dan responded with helpful thoughts that spoke to the issues concerned.
I started to interrupt with an OT inanity: "When all bowls fit uniform criteria and are universally attractive, my clunks will be scarce and much in demand." O'Boy, garbage in--- garbage out-- garbage- rare- garbage sold! It's not so bad that it isn't funny, worse it disappoints the original poster and disrespects his efforts. Further, it interrupts a potentially valuable thread and diminishes rcw.
Now my question. I hope for answers, I sure have none. Interjected wit, even if only half so, seems to have some validity. It can detour or stop incipient hostility. It can lighten up a thread that is self-aggrandizing or vulgar or vitally important only to its parent. Lugubrious or hostile threads usually go nowhere. OT interjections can make for friendly camaraderie and often lead into valuable serendipity. Certainly not always.
Can we talk? Should rcw's witty (if only to its poster) interruptive thread inserts be critiqued? Not the ones that fit chucks to spindles. How's that 'wit' for keeping to woodturning subjects? Don't answer that! Arch
.. and another thing, when comments are asked for, we all like to get responses, and they don't have to shake the earth to be appreciated. So? Arch, COC 1st.
Fortiter,