>He got the tip of one of the fingers caught under a belt...tight fitting
> >gloves, too BTW...they rushed him to the ER and I had to tear the machine
> >apart to recover the digits while the paramedics were standing by, in hopes
> >of being able to reattach them...didn't work. Lost them.
> >
> >I used to wear gloves all the time, but I'm a little leary of doing that
> >now...still wear them, just not as much. Mostly when handling raw/rough
> >stock on the jointer or things like that.
>
> That's sad, no doubt. However, do you think the outcome would have been
different if he had been wearing tight-fitting FINGERLESS
gloves? Think about it. I'm not trying to be a smart-ass or be
condescending. Just trying to point out (IMO) that fingerless
gloves don't seem to be mentioned (or even considered) in any of those
much-quoted "safety practice" guidelines.
> Peter Teubel
> Milford, MA
>
formatting link
gloves...I've seen them and I use them for riding. When I'mwearing gloves for protection, I want to protect my fingers, too. And theonly time I have gloves on that I'm not protecting my whole hand, it's on amotorcycle and I'm wearing anti-vib gloves to protect from the numb palmthing, not cuts or scrapes. Oh and it does get cold here so I wear them forprotection from the cold.
In the case of the gentleman I worked with, yes, fingerless gloves would have meant that he'd have only lost one finger and likely no or minimal "collatoral damage".
I didn't take your post as smart-ass or condescending at all, rather you brought up some very good points...I tend to not think of fingerless gloves as gloves is all...my bad, as it were.
Mike