Burying in wool in England

Jul 15, 2007 6 Replies

I think this is fascinating, I never heard of it before. I'll have to look in Smith on Wool ...



It applies to England of course, and possibly Wales.



Mary


Burials in Woollen "In 1666 an Act of Parliament was passed by which people were compelled to bury the dead in woollen. The purpose of the Act was to help the farmers and to encourage the manufacture of woollen goods. The new measure was very unpopular. From the very early times people had been accustomed to bury their dead in linen, and a great many people persisted in continuing the old practice. To put a stop to disobedience the Government imposed a fine of £5 on the offender, whenever the act was broken.. Half of the £5 was given to the poor and half to the informer. An entry (in one of the Church registers) states that, on at least one occasion, this law was brought into operation against a Salton resident. The entry reads thus: 'Elizabeth Dowker, the wife of Robert Dowker, was interred July 15th., 1692, and her corpse was wrapped in linen, for which the penalty of £5 was imposed, according to the Act of Parliament, and one half was given to the informer and the other to the church wardens, to be distributed to the poor of the parish.' The Act of Parliament which compelled people to bury the dead in woollen was finally repealed in 1814." 'A Brief History of Brawby and Salton' by Rev H.A Douglas 1937


A book that deals with many aspects of Textile manufactering, legislation etc,,, is ILLUSTRATED ENGLISH Social History by G.M>

trevelyan, Penguin books, 1964, 4 volumes. Also in related terms in The Fabric Catalog, by Metin Hardingham, A Wallaby book, 1978. Part of The Wool Versus Linen and later Versus Cotton had Political implications with coneections to Belgium cloth processors ,, Alos Did you know the the first NON NOBLE people to recieve a shield from the English Monarch was THE Company of Clothworkers in 1530.

mirjam

I've had that for yera, it's far too general for my needs.

Are you sure you mean a shield and not Arms?

I know a lot about history, and I'm a Freeman of the Worshipful Comany of Wax Chandlers.

Mary

Well, everyone should read what Befits his/her needs. It still is one of the most elaborate about that subject that you can find.

Had an other look at the page ,, yes it says Arms .....The general idea is still the same ,,, mirjam

It isn't.

It's not.

Sorry, Mirjam, you might be expert in some areas but not all.

Mary

We all work with what we can find .. i am not living next to Victoria and Albert ,,, for what i could find over the years and for my needs the book is great. I am also judging it`s quality by other subjects , with which i am familiar.

I never Claimed to be an expert in all ,,,, i just mentioned that they were the First Non Nobles to get this Honor ,,, and since i am not English i can assure you that for most People it doesn`t make such a big difference ,,,,, this differences are important to people who expert in it , to reenactors etc.... To most Non English people this is a Curiosity .... mirjam

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required