First News we saw yesterday

Lee i am not so sure that `not publicizing` will help, even if one could in this time of Celluars , internet etc,,,, keep this deeds silent. What i do agree that there should be some regulations about the how and what, is shown. Hiding such acts will either increase their use of `power` , to the point you can`t avoid publicity. But i thnk that once it was publicized , the names of the criminals should NOT be mentioned again.

only as `the Murderer of .............and here the name of the VICTIM should be given , We should Remember the Victims not the criminals. mirjam

Reply to
Mirjam Bruck-Cohen
Loading thread data ...

Thank you Lee , for your answer. I am very glad for you, that you [still] believe, that you are safe. And i truely HOPE, that your belief, will stay true and valid. I also understand your reluctance about an issue that seems `political` to you. I have learned in my life that none of us can run away from politics ,,,because politics gets us. Closing your eays ,ears and mouth [ like those 3 mythical apes] won`t change a thing about the outcome. I was very lucky that Both my grandpas, didn`t say 'we are safe it won`t happen to us`, They read the Books and newspapers and went about preparing themselves, and that is why i can now sit here and type to you . mirjam

Reply to
Mirjam Bruck-Cohen

Lee i do respect your wish , not to have a political debate, and i felt it wasn`t really such a debate. This thread started with my horrified reaction, about the murder of the Amish children. And many here mentioned that even this people , who live quietly and self Sufficiently in a rural enviroment [and are not politicaly involved] can`t escape the horrors of Asocial murderous persons. But as you asked let`s leave this aside. I was quite impresed by your remark

because some years ago we had a big Artistic debate , where somebody used similar arguments about ART WORK , [ i hope you are willing to discuss art with me ?] . We were looking through works of some artist, one of the other examiners, said that to her feeling the work showed that "the subjects haven`t gone through the inner process of making a personal feeling a generalized subject". After swalllowing and processing this `complicated` idea, both the 3rd examiner and me didn`t agree with her. 3rd examiner said that he doesn`t approove of art that speaks about Abstract generalized feelings , he wants the young artists to try and bring something of their OWN felt experiences into their work. While i said that, one of the most Generalized subjects we see are pictures of crying children, it is a Generalized Subject, but in fact the tears of a child , come from the very private pain of the child . mirjam hild it is a veey private

Reply to
Mirjam Bruck-Cohen

InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.