Preconceptions

Grrrr.

At "Back to School" day Thursday my son's teacher said (in front of about half of the third grade parents) something like "And we're sure [Woolygrrl] is going to _dress up_ and demonstrate all her quaint spinning and knitting skills this year at our Prairie Days re-enactment."

This of course focused every eye on the room on me, as I was sitting placidly in the back knitting whilst listening to the dog and pony show that was the "welcome back to school" spiel put on by the two 3rd grade teachers.

I got to explain (briefly, but I did wedge it in despite the teachers' best efforts to Move It Right Along) that no, I don't "dress up" to do demonstrations unless one considers that I put on clothes every morning like everybody else because neither knitting nor spinning are dead arts nor likely to become dead arts, and we have quite modern equipment these days although I personally don't own any modern-style spinning wheels at present so my "costume" for demonstrations is whatever I happen to put on to wear any given day.

I did so want to get this year off to a good start. Instead I had to make the teacher look like a fool in front of about 30 people, all of whom undoubtedly shared her preconceived notion of the quaintness of handwork generally and spinning specifically.

*sigh*

+++++++++++++

Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET. This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...

Reply to
Wooly
Loading thread data ...

On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:47:52 GMT, Wooly spun a fine yarn

Yeah, and these 'people'(teachers) are ed-ju-cated, LOL! Another plus for homeschooling!~~ JM2C, Noreen

Reply to
YarnWright

That was pretty nervy of her to say that without checking with you first to see if you even wanted to do a demo - never mind the comment about the clothing. Talk about making assumptions, and the ASS U ME !!

Sending sympathy your way.... and am very glad my kids are long gone from school.

Shelagh

Reply to
Shillelagh

Just because a teacher mentioned dressing up for a reenactment doesn't mean she's unaware that people still knit, spin, weave, etc. Clearly she knew that Wooly did. It would be appropriate for a participant in their "Prairie Days reenactment" to dress the part. I would have been more upset at the assumption of being able to participate, which is why my kids know not to commit me to anything until they talk to me about it first.

This incident would not be nearly enough to make me homeschool my kids, this one little error on the part of a modern teacher who likely was never taught any needlework herself. I guess I'm lucky that I can afford to send my kids to a small private school where the art teacher actually taught the entire school how to knit.

The Other Kim kimagreenfieldatyahoodotcom

Reply to
The Other Kim

On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:53:26 -0500, "Shillelagh" spewed forth :

Eh, I've already signed up to "share my hobbies" so it isn't as if she was springing a surprise on me. It was the "oh how quaint" thing I found objectionable.

+++++++++++++

Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET. This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...

Reply to
Wooly

Good on you for speaking up, it is time that "others" learn of the time and effort spent crafting handmade things. If you mention making jellies/jams or canning anything at all, the reactions that you get are akin to having made the comment in a foreign language. Perhaps these processes are also considered "quaint". DA

Reply to
DA

On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 13:57:16 -0700, "The Other Kim" spewed forth :

I part ways with the majority of people in this instance. Most of the things our ancestors did at a subsistence level are still being carried on in the world, and by a larger number of people than ego-centric Americans might be willing to admit. So in a very real sense it isn't "re-enactment" at all and I think there needs to be a greater emphasis on this fact than on "how it was in the Olde Tyme Dayes". I think there's much more room for contextual presentation without the costumes than with, but that's just my opinion, obviously.

Which is why I will most likely be asked to NOT come as a demonstrator. But that's ok. Last year my son's teacher made time one day a week for three weeks and I spent two hours each of those days with the entire class discussing fiber crafts and how they relate to modern people. The Girl Scout leader has already asked me if I'll be able to make time to lead her troop's textile arts unit (dunno yet, won't commit until I see what sort of time I need to spend on my son's activities, obviously) and the elementary science teacher asked me to pitch in with an animal husbandry unit she's got planned for the spring. So I'll get some fiber arts into the kids' pointy little heads by hook or by crook...

I've already committed to it, I think now I may be uninvited, and that's fine. See above.

I send my son to private school as well. The staff of a small private school are just as likely to be ignorant as the staff at a large public school. The private school staffers have more leeway WRT making time than their public school counterparts and as a result are more amenable to opening their classes to non-programmed activities. Or so it seems based on my observations.

+++++++++++++

Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET. This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...

Reply to
Wooly

Well, you have the opportunity to educate her, Wooly. Remember, a university education doesn't necessarily mean that someone is smart. Most of us are, but there are exceptions. Give her another chance. She meant well.

Higs, Katherine

Reply to
Katherine

She meant well.

That is the very LAST thing I would want anyone to say about me! My dad used to say to us to never put that on his headstone (grin)

Shelagh

Reply to
Shillelagh

He had a point, Shelagh. But Wooly can set her straight.

Higs, Katherine

Reply to
Katherine

On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 21:20:37 -0500, "Shillelagh" spewed forth :

Same here. Hopefully somebody will mind my will, in which I ask for a plaque somewhere (no grave for me, burn me and put me back into the food chain thanks) saying that I did my damnedest but the fools won anyhow. I'm thinking it won't happen, but I can hope, right?

+++++++++++++

Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET. This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...

Reply to
Wooly

On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 17:16:22 -0400, DA spun a fine yarn

OHMYGAWD, yes! I mentioned once about canning and putting food by and people said: WHY? If it ain't at the store, I don't need it. This from also 'ed-ju-cated' people, LOL! Noreen

Reply to
YarnWright

On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 22:30:12 -0300, Katherine spun a fine yarn

Book smart and logic dumb....... LOL Noreen

Reply to
YarnWright

On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 03:57:29 GMT, Wooly spun a fine yarn

me/thinks IF I have a headstone (probably NOT), but IF I did, I'd want mine to say:

Bury me face down so the whole world can KMA.

LOL! Noreen

Reply to
YarnWright

Well said Katherine,

I see Kim's point of view but I completely see Wooly's also.

I believe she meant good Wooly but thanks for educating some one on how important and enlightening crafts can be and how modernized some of it has become.

Hugs & God bless, Dennis & Gail

Reply to
SpikeDriver

If you want it, it should happen.

Higs, Katherine

Reply to
Katherine

Yepper. Sigh!

Higs, Katherine

Reply to
Katherine

My thoughts exactly, Dennis.

Higs, Katherine

Reply to
Katherine

On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 11:08:24 -0300, Katherine spun a fine yarn

And... that's not to say ALL 'ed-ju-cated' people are logic dumb, either.... but...... Hugs, Noreen

Reply to
YarnWright

Nor are all "un-educated" people street smart, right?

Higs, Katherine

Reply to
Katherine

InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.