> I can totally
>> understand when you have a child who needs special attenttion that
>> you breast feed whenever and where ever, as needed. Having said
>> that, I have never understood (and this is me getting old most
>> likely) women who breast feed a child in a noisy restaurant, at the
>> same time yakking to a friend and having two crying kids hanging on
>> her skirts. This is exactly what I saw a couple of days ago, while
>> meeting a friend for lunch. Would it not be much easier for
>> everyone, to meet the friend at her or your own home for lunch.
It isn't necessarily easier to meet at someone's house. They may live
40 miles in either direction, or one may have a situation that makes it impossible to have a family visit - construction being done, bad neighborhood, etc.
Also, the mother with all the kids may have really needed to get out and talk to an non-family adult.
All of those kids should have been home, if they were interfering
>with other people's enjoyment of lunch. I agree with you, Els.
>While I think that people should be able to take their children
>to restaurants, if they are a total disruption, then they shouldn't >be there.
There's a difference between "two crying kids hanging on" and "total disruption". While I am the first to wince at the sound of crying kids in restaurants, I also have been in a restaurant where the unhappy infant/toddler was in my family. Sometimes there is nothing you can do - e.g., teething, sudden earache, etc. If you've already ordered, you can't just walk out. That's why there is a category called "family restaurant," so the adults who can't deal with it can go find the other kind.
=Tamar