I'm a self taught embroiderer and have discovered that books can only tell you so much. The main issue I have today is about fastening off the thread when finished with the stitch(es). All the books I have read say to NEVER tie a knot on the back because it will leave unsightly bumps on the right side. What is recommended in the books is to run the thread through several of the stitches on the back and that should hold it very well.
That sounded good, until I started a project for embroidery on clothing. It seems like the thread would eventually come unraveled with all the washing if it isn't secured with some sort of knot.
To knot or not, that is the question. What say you?
Knot. I have no issues with knots (except on counted cross stitch), because what else are you going to do?
As for "unsightly bumps," well, I can't tell from the front of my own work where the knots are. I can tell you where I missed stitches, but I can't tell you where the knots are.
Thank you for your input. It makes me feel much better. And I'm glad to hear that you've used Fray Check, because I have too, and wondered at the time if I was "breaking the rules" of emroidery.
Now, I never thought of using interfacing as a backing, but that would probably be a good solution, too. I guess it stays on really good?
If you are embroidering for yourself and don't give a hoot what anyone else thinks; are pleased with your surface stitches, then do what you think will work the best for you.
Weaving threads on the backs of the work will NOT cause the ends to come loose during repeated washings. I know that people who haven't had a lot of experience are just *sure* that it won't hold. But, it does. There are also sneaky little ways to start your threads so that they are completely covered and secured by your top stitching.
If you are embroidering to really learn the intricacies, plan to embroider things like napkins that will be seen on the back as well as the front, or plan to enter your pieces in a judging such as a county or state fair, then you would be wise not to knot or use alternative products such as Fray Check . . . and to learn how to secure the backs by weaving.
If you pierce the threads of the stitches while weaving, that will doubly ensure things don't come loose.
For more on this subject, download section three here:
Believe it or not, running the thread under some stitches, especially if you change directions, is amazingly secure, even on clothing that will be washed in the washer.
As usual, Dianne is absolutely right. Most rctners know I am a scientist, and I suggest you try a little experiment. Finish off an end by running it under the stitches at the back, and then try and undo it. You will probably break the needle if you try using that. With a pair of tweezers.if you a very careful, you can just about get it undone, but often, the thread breaks before it comes undone. I know from experience. I leave my ends unfinished, until the ends are well into parts that are completely stitched. Then I finish the ends off. Occasionally, I have finished the end off wrong, and it is a PITA to try and undo it.
I'm working on a piece that has isolated french knots. Knotting on the back was pretty much my only option, even then a real trick not to pull too hard as to distort the french knot on the front.
For clothing I`d run it through under a few stitches in the usual way, then do it again in the opposite direction. Or even once more if you`re really worried that it might get heavy wear.
Rule No. 1. The floss goes through the eye of the needle. Rule No. 2. The needle is moved from back to front to back to front to back and on and on. Rule No. 3. There are eight different ways to combine / and \ to make X. Use the one that suits you. Rule No. 4. Whichever way you combine \ and / to make X, make sure the same leg is on the top throughout the project. Rule No. 5. *All* the rest is commentary. That includes the nonsense about "overdyed flosses must be stitched in a certain pattern." Uh, no, they mustn't. It depends upon the project and the effect you want.
I've always heard that there are only two 'rules'.
1) the thread goes through the eye of the needle (it's hard to get the thread through the fabric without using a needle, and it's even harder to get the thread through the point of the needle....)
2) the needle goes through the fabric, leaving thread on top of the fabric to make a stitch.
All else is commentary, including the "all stitches cross the same way".
Right after posting this quesiton, I went to your webiste and found your Primer. Didn't have to to read it all, but I did read the part about fastening off thread, and WOW, found out I have been wrong about it not being secure! Thanks!
OK, I'm convinced - mostly, anyway. I do plan to test it on just a quick piece of embroidery made just for this purpose. I can believe that yall know of what you speak, but there's just a part of me that needs to prove it.
But, now, I have another question on this same topic. What about those times when the stiches are few and far between? I may not be explaining very well, but I'm talking about stitches that aren't consecutive. How is one to begin and end without knotting? An example might be when one is using a more sheer type of material and is using Lazy Daisey stitches in a flower pattern. So that the thread doesn't show through going from one Lazy Daisey to the next, shouldn't it be fastened off for each stitch? Or even if one isn't using sheer material, the back of the Lazy Daisey stitches are more loose than tight, so I still am confused about running the thread through the backs of stitches in this scenario.
If you can't weave round and round on the back of a stitch, or make a teeny granito (in/out same holes numerous times), then a couple of buttonhole stitches or knot may be your only recourse. It is not that common to have isolated stitches. Usually you have *something* on which to start your thread. But I'll grant you, not always. sometimes it's our interpretation of a design and our knowledge of stitches you can use. For instance, many designs show little circles that some embroiderers might interpret as French knots, when in fact you could use a granito, or even an eyelet. This solves the starting/ending dilemma.
Patterns designed for sheer fabrics usually don't have stitches such as lazy daisy. If you have that type of pattern printed on a sheer organdy (for instance), you would be actually doing padded whitework, or tiny satin stitches using a single strand of floss.
You have to consider all the angles when you first start a project. And no, a single strand of floss doesn't get lost in the design. It stands out nicely against the background. The trick is to make tiny stitches.
Most lazy daisy flowers are quite small and moving from one petal to another doesn't create a problem on muslin, percale, etc. But I will suggest to you that many patterns were not meant to be embroidered at all (that include these flowers). They were/are quilting patterns. So the scale is quite large.
No thanks necessary. It's why RCTN exists and the Internet continues to be a blessing. We teach each other! Tomorrow, I'll be the one with the question. Dianne
InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.