An observation from an American
Just reading the posts in this group, it would appear many make voting decisions based on the canvassing (making a broad assumption based on an extremely small sample - don't worry, I'm not, really). Surprising, as I don't see much canvassing going on here. Don't know if it's a difference in political philosophy or process or plain American laziness. And based on the fact that it appears to be the behavior of the canvaser as much as (or more than) the political leanings of the candidate, it highlights the importance of having "good" canvassers onboard.
I admit to allowing the tenor of the tv ads to sway my voting decisions, to a degree. By which I mean I'm more likely to vote for candidates who do NOT run attack ads but instead speak to their own political philosophy and office intentions. However, the majority of a politician's stated or acted-out views must coincide with mine. I'll never find one who completely matches. If you were to ask them, the far-right-wingers would likely label me a raving liberal while the far-left-wingers would label me a narrow-minded conservative. {shrug} I label myself a moderate and registered Independent.
Just some political/philosophical musings from the corrupt state of California. (I'm new to this state and must say it really seems to have some serious problems with its politicians. We arrived in San Diego just in time for the special mayoral election and sentencing of a number of City councilmen and admission by a leading congressman of his years of being on the take and revelation that the mayor of one of the suburbs is a slumlord and the governator trying to shut up some of the special interest groups by making it illegal for them to speak out and ...)
Helen