New Log Cabin Quilt

Feb 19, 2007 136 Replies

OK, if we're going to talk about this book I have to point out that it is Eats, Shoots, and Leaves. The whole pun of 'Eats Shoots' is kind of lost with the title.

Not to pick on anyone but after the 3rd post with the wrong title I had to speak up. I'm not an editor, just a technical writer!

I once bought a pair of those cheap canvas slip-on shoes with something like rope for the soles at a discount store. They were labelled 'shoes' $1 so I always called them my quote shoes unquote.

obligatory quilt topic - I've been working on my Christmas quilt, plus making batik squares from a LQS BOM. I don't always like their combinations of batiks, and I'm still looking for another piece of fabric for the Christmas quilt (hard to find in February!) so I'm having a lot of SEX.

More about that later....

Lynnette

First off, let me make clear that I are one. :) So I'm not even close to potshotting anybody; I understand the obsessions involved intimately.

(My last email rant to a newspaper writer was over the statement "They may not understand that they're implying X." Um, no; if you're implying it, you understand that you are doing so. Now what you choose to *infer* from my statement I may not understand; I won't contest that, as inferring doesn't necessarily have any connection with what the original speaker actually meant. )

So wandering off into a thread that's really geared for us obsessives to mutter together (a recuperation diversion), which do you find more irksome:

Incorrect usage of terminology: examples: misuse of "speaker implies/hearer infers", "very unique" (unique = "one of a kind"---how can something be "very one of a kind"?), "begging the question" being used to mean "leads us to ask" rather than "trying to use what you're trying to prove as proof of itself", etc.

Incorrect usage of homonynms: examples: "he poured over the papers" (what did he pour? WHY would he do such a thing? Didn't it make a mess?) "she peddled her bicycle" (OK, I guess you can, but it seems a bit distracted to me to postpone a trip to grandma's house to sell one's bicycle, and wouldn't that slow you down, especially since you now have to walk there?) and so forth. Am I the only one that notices that even highly reputable publishers and newspapers seem to be mistaking spellchecking for proofreading these days?

Gross mispronunciation: examples: my current raw nerve, the Texas Instruments DLP commercial series with the little girl: "It's the mirs!" I really want them to either teach her that mirror has two syllables or change their website to itsthemirs.com. If it's acceptable to mangle pronunciation in even the most formal, planned, and high-priced corporate contexts (and surely an advertising campaign is just that), then can we at least shoot for consistency and change the spelling? Let's all spend Febby-airy going to the liberry to look up nukular mirs. :)

Let the rant begin, and with examples! ;-)

--pig, noting she didn't notice any knee pain while contemplating/typing this

pig, I sympathize with the obsession over language and usage. My current pet peeve (and I've sent multiple emails to the about it) is the inability of any reporter on NPR to pronounce the word 'veterinary' or 'veterinarian' correctly. The'er' is dropped from the word entirely. While I may be willing to overlook the pronunciation as a regional dialect in some cases, not so from the mouths of press professionals!

It's the pronunciations that get to me. I have been stressing to my students that if they pronounce words correctly, they will be more likely to spell them correctly.

Then I walked into a 5th grade classroom where the teacher had written the date as Valentines Day, Febuary 14, 2007.

Linda PATCHogue, NY

warsh (as in wash) are when it should be our masonry said as masonary.

Just a few off the t> pig, I sympathize with the obsession over language and usage. My current pet

Distraction from contemplation of pain is always a good thing. :)

--pig

Oh, good grief!! As the daughter of an English major, all the things mentioned annoy me. My mom use to tell me the very same thing; pronounce it correctly, and spelling becomes much easier. Her other favorite remark was "Words have meanings!" She said this when people used a word in the wrong context, or used it to mean something it was never intended to mean.

;)) I am known for my red pen - honestly! I am currently going through training on our upcoming new software change, and promptly took my red pen to the instruction manual to point out misspellings and grammar issues. I then handed it back to the instructor. Oh, we are paying $1 million dollars for this change, so it seems the least they could do is spell correctly!

Our CEO and Deputy Executive Officer rout> Oh, good grief!! As the daughter of an English major, all the things

Such errors in a training manual are inexcusable!

I am slipping into the habit of using internet abbreviations/grammar/punctuation in emails and posts, but I would never mail a letter that was not thoroughly checked. The same applies to the notes I print out for my classes. I will not pass out notes that have spelling/grammar errors. And it annoys me that my failing eyesight means that I might miss spelling errors more often now. (Don't anyone mention spellcheck - we use English spelling here, remember lol)

But what excuse do Govt Departments have to allow such poor standards of correspondence on their letterheads?

The attitude now is "if it gets the message across, what difference does it make?", but I recently wrote a tender for a friend who is definitely challenged in the writing skills area. When he was advised that he had won the tender he was told that his was not the best bid, but that he had submitted the most professional paperwork and was therefore seen as the best tenderer. So at least some out there still look for standards in writing and communication.

snip

This is an interesting subject albeit OT. However, how do you address the differences with pronunciation between regions? Who determines what is correct and incorrect? How do you account for the very significant differences or, more correctly, changes in the meaning of words, take 'gay' for example or 'cool'.

The big strength of the English language and no doubt other languages is they change through common usage to reflect the needs of the users and pressures of the time. While I agree with everyone on the irritation of mispronunciation, bad grammar, mangled use of words, I'm afraid this is the result of working in a 'living' and 'dynamic' language.

I do so agree ... but, if I started, there would be a book-length message >ggFirst off, let me make clear that I are one. :) So I'm not even close to

Yes Edward - but one of my college subjects was advanced Latin >gg<

Deduce what you wish ...! . In message , Edward W. Thompson writes

ARGH!!!

My nit-pick of the moment is There's/Theirs and there/their/they're.

Oh, and spelling and grammar checking on the computer that tells me I have it wrong when I write a sentence of 40+ words with three sets of parentheses... :D

Then there's the split infinitive no man has splat before.

"begs the questions": I have only _ever_ heard it used in as "leads us to ask".

Of course, I do proofs for a living, and end up using phrases like "circular reasoning" even with friends/family not from work, who may not be entirely sure what I mean by that...

Hanne in London - intrigued

I taught English up to university entrance level on and off for many years. I am dyslexic. The spelling checker is a wonderful tool, but it does annoy me that these days so many kids use it without checking to ensure that it is both set to the correct version of the language for the area and exam system in which they live and work, and that they accept it's corrections without checking that it has given them the correct word, or the correct version of the word chosen.

For people like me who have no problem with pronunciation (I was brought up in an RAF environment, mostly in England, by Scots parents, and my 'accent' is close to BBC/received pronunciation, with odd pockets of Scots here and there), spelling can still be challenging, and genuine errors hold no fears for me. There is, however, no acceptable reason an no excuse for sending out official documents with spelling or grammatical errors, and I too get out the red pen and send them back for correction.

I am a very firm believer in the organic nature of language, and have no trouble with words being hijacked, altered, changing their use over time, and with grammar changing and adapting to suit new circumstances. However, I am firmly against spelling reformation: that way you lose the roots of the language, the context of the vocabulary, the ability to map the changes, and, ultimately, the meaning. English as we speak it today is a complex collection and amalgamation of languages: the vocabulary and grammar have been absorbed from many root languages, and there are more shades of meaning in it than in almost any other. We need to continue this growth and change, not stifle it. But we also need to accept and acknowledge those roots and the conventions of grammar and spelling that go with them if we are to make any sense to ourselves and those around us. Let me recommend Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation by Lynne Truss (Paperback -

31 Oct 2005) and Talk to the Hand: The Utter Bloody Rudeness of Everyday Life (or Six Good Reasons to Stay Home and Bolt the Door) by Lynne Truss (Hardcover

- 31 Oct 2005)

And always remember: spelling and grammar 'rools' are more a set of guidelines and convention than laws! They are optional: fabric isn't!

One of my favorites. And the added introduction in the American edition is a bonus! Roberta in D

"Patti" schrieb im Newsbeitrag news: snipped-for-privacy@quik.clara.co.uk...

I teach a developmental reading class where phonemic awareness and phonics is stressed. These are children who are 9-11 years old and reading 2 or more years below grade level despite average or above average intelligence.

I explain to them how the English language has changed and where words come from. I teach them about our Lawn Guyland accent and how it affects words. They have great fun doing exaggerations of this but it does focus their attentions on the words. This helps them understand word meanings and word spellings.

Linda PATCHogue, NY

My papers dun as ewe kin sea Its jest as grate as it kin bee This I know bee cause I have a spell Czech on my pea sea

Eye strike a key and type a word And weight fore it too say Weather eye am wrong oar write It shows me write a weigh.

Sew Teacher eye now no Cuz my chequer tolled me sew This papers perfect all the weigh Throw aweigh that read pen and Jest mark this with an aye.

Linda PATCHogue, NY

I agree wholeheartedly with you, Cheryl. DH isn't the best in spelling and grammar, so he *always* has me proof what he's sending out to his students. When he was a high school principal, he did the same; his secretary couldn't be trusted to correct things, as she was almost as bad at spelling as he is and didn't care. :S

It used to embarrass me no end that letters from the district office went out to parents with glaring mistakes in them. It infuriates me that government sends out similar paperwork. I've even been tempted to write to our local television and radio stations to ask if they have anyone on staff to proofread newscasts and check pronunciation before someone goes on the air and messes up.

It's just awful! My current pet peeve is the difference in its/it's and similar words with and without apostrophes. I can't figure out why people can't see that an apostrophe on a pronoun means that a letter is missing. Therefore, "it's" really means "it is", not that something belongs to "it". :S There is no such thing as "her's" or "their's". Sheesh.

Go, Pig! In my former life as a responsible, earning adult, I was a writer. I was a newspaper writer/reporter for my entire career. Newspapers often opt for "calarity over grammar" -- as if the two were mutually exclusive. Drove me nuts. Even though I always intended to be a reporter, my degree was in English Literature. My husband is now City Editor of our local newspaper. He and I have had some snippy discussions through our years together about language. His position is that language and spelling are evolving, as they always have, and that staid, stuffy traditionalists had better just give it up. My position is that there is correct and there is incorrect and that people who want to make their words public should first make certain that those words are correct. I grit my teeth all the time when reading everything from major daily newspapers to blogs. OMG people! Get a tiny little copy of Strunk and White and learn to write the English language.

(I am not talking about folks, like all of us here, who "talk" on posting boards. I really don't get too worked up about grammar or spelling or such when we are having what amounts to a friendly and very casual conversation. Nobody here is intending to publish their words and immortalize their posts, so please don't be offended by my little rant here.)

Enough ranting. You get the picture. I fervantly wish that people who write for public consumption would consult the necessary books/ websites/English teachers and write with precision and conformity to standard English. And yes, I AM one of "those people".

Sunny who grew up in rural, hicksville Texas saying such things as "nukuler mirs" and "liberry" and "it's down around the co'ner", and if I can learn and change, anybody can

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required