Re: markings on Screw Pitch Gauge?

Feb 17, 2004 1 Replies

First reply

Jonathan Barnes

treat the first number as TPI I have added witworth form thread depth in inches..... doubleing it gives the second number. N.B. unified thread depth is diferent, at 40 tpi for exampe it's 0.015336. Hope this helps

Read the full reply


> I've got an old screw pitch gauge that I inherited. There's no mfr's


> > name marked on it, just "Number 137".
>
> > the individual leaves are marked with two numbers each, but these
> > numbers are not reciprocals. The first number is always a small
> > integer which I presume is threads-per-inch.
>
> > the second number is always a decimal.
>
> > Any idea what the second set of numbers are?
>
> pairs of numbers are
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 60 - 0.021
> 48 - 0.026
> 40 - 0.032
> 32 - 0.040
> 30 - 0.043
> 28 - 0.046
> 26 - 0.049
> 25 - 0.051
> 24 - 0.063
> 22 - 0.058
> 20 - 0.064
> 19 - 0.067
> 16 - 0.080
> 14 - 0.091
> 13 - 0.098
> 12 - 0.107
> 11 - 0.115
> 10 - 0.126
> 9 - 0.142
> 8 - 0.160
> 7 - 0.183
> 6 - 0.215
> 5 - 0.259
> 4-1/2 - 0.284 (sic)
> 4 - 0.320
>
> looking at the leaves, "depth of thread" in inches seems the most
> plausible to me. This item would date back to the 50's, I don't
> believe there was too much metric action in American machine shops at > that time. >
> I'd try _measuring_ the depths with a micrometer, but I don't know
> where to measure to/from. How is thread depth defined? And by the
> way, who sets the standards on how these things are measured?

treat the first number as TPI I have added witworth form thread depth in inches..... doubleing it gives the second number.

N.B. unified thread depth is diferent, at 40 tpi for exampe it's 0.015336.

Hope this helps

-- Jonathan

Barnes's theorem; for every foolproof device there is a fool greater than the proof.

To reply remove AT

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required