OT: Update on Monster Cable

I just found out they're suing *SIXTEEN HUNDRED* small businesses that use the word "Monster" in their name.

These companies need to file a class-action suit against Monster Cable. That is an EVIL behavior for a company, and they need to be stopped.

Reply to
Kalera Stratton
Loading thread data ...

Do you really think they can win? Especially with such obvious illegal activity such as stealing the domains by forging signatures? I agree - those people need to file a class action lawsuit. That's awful - I wish good luck to your friends.

Reply to
Kandice Seeber

yes, didn't Monster.com just get bought by one of the major internet providers who probably have more than enough money to crush a local cable company

Reply to
Armand Vine

That's them.

-Kalera

formatting link
formatting link
Helen C wrote:

Reply to
Kalera Stratton

That's the company that's doing it.

-Kalera

formatting link
formatting link
Armand V> yes, didn't Monster.com just get bought by one of the major internet

Reply to
Kalera Stratton

To clarify, Monster.com is affiliated with Monster Cable.

-Kalera

formatting link
formatting link
Kalera Stratt> That's the company that's doing it.

Reply to
Kalera Stratton

Kalera: Are you saying that monster.com was bought by monstercable.com? I don't think that is true. My nephew works for monsterworldwide which is the parent company for monster.com

Hmmm...I'm gonna delve into this further...and give them "what for" if it's true, which I'm not sure it is.

Reply to
lgreene

My understanding is that they are affiliated... I could be wrong, though. They do have a link to Monstercable.com on the Monster.com home page, at the bottom.

-Kalera

formatting link
formatting link
lgreene wrote:

Reply to
Kalera Stratton

Do you have a link to any story on this? Gotta spread the word!!

Val

Reply to
VManes

Yeah, but what about monster.com?

Helen C

Reply to
Helen C

I'm working on it... I have yet to find any organized news story on it, so it NEEDS to hit the media. I think I'm going to do some more fact-checking and write something up to send out to newspapers, and maybe do a little website disseminating info on the suits.

-Kalera

formatting link
formatting link
VManes wrote:

Reply to
Kalera Stratton

so it NEEDS to hit the media. I think I'm going to do some more fact-checking and write something up to send out to newspapers, and >

dont need to fact check -- I checked and their are lawsuits filed on the trademark website!

they even had the balls to sue Discovery Inc. -- for MONSTER GARAGE the show...!!! And the BOSTON RED SOX for their "Monster seats", and "monster baseball" slogan, and BALLY gaming company for a "monster" slot machine, and HANNA BARBERA for "Scooby Doo and the Monster of Mexico" to -- little guys like "Scribble Monster" a children's coloring book....!!! (BTW - that case has been terminated too.... as are MANY OF THEM, click on the case number in the left column and look at the top left of the entry page second line -- it will say STATUS: Terminated. That means the case is no longer active....)

Looking at many of the documents -- it appears Monster Cable got in over their head -- some plaintiffs filed actions to "compel discovery" - which MC ignored, failed to show at discovery actions, etc... which would explain the terminations of cases... if they don't show up - the case can be closed by the magistrate for failure to go forward....

Most of these cases were FILED in 2001 and 2002 - and some are now marked "terminated"... i.e. the Cable people gave up - or lost interest ....

However - some of the big ones are still fighting it out- and cases won't come to trial (if ever) until August of 2005....

some of the paperwork admonished MC that their delays might result in sanctions..... I think Monster Cables found out the hard way - that the Patent and Trademark office wasn't buying their little game... or that they bit off more than they could chew....

They MIGHT be trying to play it with small change people - by doing threatening letters -- but if the people RESIST and force them to file a trademark challenge - Monster Cable is probably going to lose unless their is a "similarity" of the corporate function ....

- but they sure are making life miserable for a lot of people who don't know how to fight this - I am sure...

US Patent and Trademark Office -- suits against "monster" listed here

formatting link
Some trademark lawyer needs to file a RULE 11 request for sanctions against their company lawyer --because they sure as heck know that they can't monopolize the word "monster" outside of their own niche in the industry (i.e. cables)!!! - and it's apparent from some of the PTO letters that they are thinking along the same lines where MC doesn't show up for discovery, or hasn't responded to inquiries from the plaintiffs.... That's probably why your friend "backed them down"

they are probably just trying to see how many little guys they can back down

Reply to
Cheryl

OHHHH

I found one in the list - by a TEMCO Corp (Japan - with registry in CA)

where they are ATTACKING BACK against Monster Cable -- claiming Monster Cable's trademark registry will damage THEIRS -- which was "in use as early as 1997" and already approved by the Trademark office!!!! They want the Patent and Trademark office to CANCEL "Monster Cable"s registry ... LOL

turn about is FAIR PLAY!!!!! heh heh heh (going to court - Aug 2005)

Cheryl DRAGON BEADS Flameworked beads and glass

formatting link

Reply to
Cheryl

Monster Cable and Monster.com are NOT related companies at ALL. Get a clue before you start pontificating on a subject you have no clue about. Stop flapping your lips and do some research. Monster.com is HUGE media conglomerate. Monster Cable is a small speaker cable manufacturer.

Reply to
linda

Bwahahahah!

KarenK

Reply to
Karen_AZ

They definitely have too many lawyers with too much time on their hands.

Guess I'm gonna stick with Radio Shack cables for my stereo needs. Val

Reply to
VManes

Rude or anything? I believe Kalera and others *have* done their research. How would you know they have no clue? And where do you get off telling others what to say on a public newsgroup?

Reply to
Kandice Seeber

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 1:05:48 -0400, Kalera Stratton wrote (in message ):

I'm full rightnow, so I'll pass on your on your generous offer of refeshtment. The two companies are not related, and the link at the monster.com is there merely for the convenience of the cable customers.

This newspaper story explains the disconnect:

formatting link
It sounds to me that Monnster cable was too slow or too stupid to buy the plain monster.com domain, and it is trying to make the little guys pay for it. I sugges that someone register monsterfables.com, monstertable.com and monsterwires.com. If there's a little cash left, I also like monsterslob.com

Kathy N-V

Reply to
Kathy N-V

That invitation wasn't for you, Kathy... I just didn't need to be insulted right then. As I did say, I had just found out about the lawsuit against my friends and was very upset and not in possession of all the information... and I also said that I could be wrong about several things, that being one of them. *I had never heard of monster.com or Monster Cable before yesterday*. If aforementioned female canine knew they weren't connected, all she had to do was say so... there was no call to be insulting about it. The LINK does imply a connection.

Having a link on your website to another company is usually considered an act of affiliation, so that was a pretty logical mistake to make... I certainly didn't need to be jumped on by some nobody over it.

-Kalera

formatting link
formatting link
Kathy N-V wrote:

Reply to
Kalera Stratton

Huh? If that were true then everyone on the internet would be affiliate with everyone else to one degree or another.

I have a number of links to various companies on my website for which I get no compensation, and with which I am not affiliated. Nobody has ever mistaken me and my website as being a division of Such-and-Such Co.

Arondelle

Reply to
Arondelle

InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.