Off topic - oh what will they do next

Cute little guy, but what does this say about the security check, or lack thereof, in Florida.

On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:54:17 -0400, "Lucille" wrote: X-No-Archive Yes

It says what I have been saying all the time. You can have all the security you want but if someone is set on carrying something on, or doing something, they will find a way. People who wish to fly should just accept they are perhaps under additional risk and then carry on as usual.

Then we can fly as we did, take our scissors etc. and quit taking three hours to check in and all that stupidity.

On this side of the world , `terror` events of all kinds and volumes are prevented almost daily by those checks ,,, i would rather have longer hours waiting in an airfield , than no more hours at all , mirjam

I can figure out how he got it in the first airplane and even how it might have gotten through customs. But, the monkey had to go pee at some point and this guy was willing to let it do it in his HAIR....

What the people that couldn't understand that New Hampshire was likely to be COLD in January?

Cheryl

On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:20:05 -0400, Cheryl Isaak wrote: X-No-Archive Yes

Lol - must have been a bit of monkeying around

You're name isn't Fred! c

On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 07:18:12 -0400, Cheryl Isaak wrote: X-No-Archive Yes

lol

On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:20:05 -0400, Cheryl Isaak wrote: X-No-Archive Yes

I think I have the answer. The guy must have had to go pee himself, while in the washroom the monkey pees too. Monkeys are very trainable, so I am sure that is what happened. After all, if the monkey just peed under the hat, it would have trickled down and been seen, it clearly would not have been sweat.

More than anyone else wanted to think about I am sure lolol

Pat

"Cheryl Isaak"

Glad to see I`m not the only one who`s mind follows the obvious direction, Cheryl! ;-)

Pat