The annals of woodturning are usually filled with opinions and advice regarding techniques of turning and equipment to buy, but lately they've been about a perception that we must learn and apply the principles of classic form and design.
At times, we have all found a wrong technique, a cheap tool or a poor design that worked better than the the 'only way'. We went ahead and did it once 'our way' with success, but we felt a need to explain our fall from grace, even to apologize for a transgression. We sure didn't pursue it.
If you always follow the crowd, I guess you can never get ahead of the crowd. There was a time when David Ellsworth's small orifice hollow forms were a lonely 'leading edge'. Then they became the expert's 'state of the art' and later on became the advanced turners' "speciality". Now with the help of special tools and widely available instruction they are a popular 'staple' turned by many followers.
I wonder if breaking the rules of classic design or the standards of today is a bad thing. Are imaginative turners often the exception that proves the rule? Their leading edge becomes state of the art and will become accepted norm. Maybe their vision is better than ours, but just maybe they are brash enough to leave the pack, even if it tarnishes the golden ratio.
It seems to me that if everyone turned according to a golden ratio and current fashion, the turning world would by definition, be filled with average work, tiresome even when crafted to high standards.
We all protest "I turn how & what pleases me", but most of us, are closet conformists. If you don't believe me look at the turnings around you. The classics abound, but the innovations stand out. Whether that's good or bad should be strictly your call.
To the majority of us average types who break the rules of accepted style and design now and then; feel pride not failure. To the few who leave the crowd to make new rules only to have them broken later; thanks and rock on!
Turn to Safety, Arch Fortiter