I understand what you are saying, Tina. I really do. I just don't think it applies here. If the things that were pointed out would have been of use to anyone else, then yes--I would totally welcome it in the newsgroup--because it would mean potentially helping lots of folks. Like when people _ask_ about whether or not their page scrolls, or the text is too little or whatnot--others can benefit from the advice given. But in this case, I'm not seeing how anyone else would have benefited from seeing my mistake(s) pointed out. I honestly feel it could have been discussed in an e-mail. Unless, there is currently someone else out there running charity auctions with items donated by Becki, and I'm just not aware of it.
I am very new to this sort of thing, and I will make mistakes. I did apologise for not crediting the donations correctly. I am taking steps to make it a non-issue.
I must admit--the crediting thing took me aback because it didn't occur to me that mentioning the donor's name was a central part of the auctions. I was more focused on the end result. I only did it at all because it seemed to work under the first handler.
I appreciate each and every person who has taken the time to donate whatever they could, and slighting anyone wasn't my intention. But from now on, the donor names will stay on the webpage, and the pertinent information about the items will be the focus on the auction pages.