ot: A (not so PC) letter from Paul Harvey

Paul Harvey has hit this right on the head. I believe that we all should

take the approach of "Live and Let Live."

****************************************

Paul Harvey says:

I don't believe in Santa Claus, but I'm not going to sue somebody for

singing a Ho-Ho-Ho song in December. I don't agree with Darwin, but I

didn't go out and hire a lawyer when my high school teacher taught his

theory of evolution.

Life, liberty or your pursuit of happiness will not be endangered

because someone says a 30-second prayer before a football game.So what's

the big deal?

~

It's not like somebody is up there reading the entire book of Acts.

They're just talking to a God they believe in and asking him to grant

safety to the players on the field and the fans going home from the

game.

~

"But it's a Christian prayer," some will argue.Yes, and this is the

United States of America, a country founded on

Christian principles. According to our very own phone book, Christian

churches outnumber all others better than 200-to-1. So what would you

expect--somebody chanting Hare Krishna?

~

If I went to a football game in Jerusalem, I would expect to hear a

Jewish prayer.

If I went to a soccer game in Baghdad, I would expect to hear a Muslim

prayer.

If I went to a ping pong match in China, I would expect to hear someone

pray to Buddha.And I wouldn't be offended. It wouldn't bother me one

bit.When in Rome...

~

But what about the atheists?" is another argument.What about them?

Nobody is asking them to be baptized. We're not going to pass the

collection plate. Just humor us for 30 seconds. If that's asking too

much, bring a Walkman or a pair of ear plugs. Go to the bathroom. Visit

the concession stand. Call your lawyer!

~

Unfortunately, one or two will make that call. One or two will tell

thousands what they can and cannot do.I don't think a short prayer at a

football game is going to shake the world's foundations......

~~

Christians are just sick and tired of turning the other cheek while our

courts strip us of all our rights. Our parents and grandparents taught

us to pray before eating; to pray before we go to sleep.

Our Bible tells us to pray without ceasing. Now a handful of people and

their lawyers are telling us to cease praying.

God, help us.

And if that last sentence offends you, well ... just sue me.

~

The silent majority has been silent too long. It's time we let that one

or two who scream loud enough to be heard .... that the vast majority

don't care what they want. It is time the majority rules! It's time we

tell them, you don't have to pray; you don't have to say the pledge of

allegiance; you don't have to believe in God or attend services that

honor Him.

That is your right, and we will honor your right. But by golly, you are

no longer going to take our rights away. We are fighting back.....and we

WILL WIN!

God bless us one and all .. especially those who denounce Him. God bless

America, despite all her faults. She is still the greatest nation of

all.

God bless our service men and women who are fighting to protect our

right to pray and worship God.

May 2006 be the year the silent majority is heard and we put God back as

the foundation of our families and institutions.

Keep looking up.

If you agree with this, please pass it on. If not ... delete and God

bless you.......

Reply to
SNIGDIBBLY
Loading thread data ...

Look, it doesn't bother me in the least if someone wishes me a Merry Christmas. I take it in the spirit it's offered, which I assume is a generous and well-meaning one. But I don't like being marginalized in a country that has long prided itself on being a haven for people of all colors and faiths. Being in the majority should not mean silencing the minority.

Some years ago, when the Minnesota Twins played the Atlanta Braves in the World Series, there was a huge to-do about the "Tomahawk Chop" of the Braves. Native Americans in Minnesota found it offensive. Atlantans said, in essence, "too bad, we don't mean anything by it." They were, of course, in the majority, but I don't think that gave them the right to continue doing something that others felt hurt by.

If I go to a football game at Notre Dame University, I expect that there will be prayers and that they will be Catholic. If I go to a concert in a Methodist church, I'm not going to complain when it ends with Christmas carols. But I think I should have the right to go to secular functions in public places without feeling as if I'm in a church. I should have the right to be in a secular space without having any religious activity or imagery imposed on me.

You can say I don't have to participate, which is true as far as it goes. But it's like trying to avoid smelling perfume in a public place. I have no intention of outlawing perfume, but I would like to see people use it so that only the people they're close to smell it.

--Heidi Plattsburgh (UPstate) NY

formatting link

Reply to
hfw

Much as I don't think this is the venue for these discussions...I'm going to break a rule and jump in here with an 'alternative' look at this issue. On the surface, this sounds so reasonable who could disagree? I don't have a problem with it, and I'm one of those awful ten headed Christians that popular culture has become so fond of hating. But the folks who shout 'tolerance' the loudest aren't being entirely honest if actions speak louder than words. I wouldn't have any disagreement about not having prayer at ballgames, quilting bees or Walmart, or having a moment of silence rather than prayer in public venues, not proclaiming one holiday over another etc. But it doesn't end there. This country WAS founded on a Judeo/Christian model, (you can rewrite history to make it more politically correct, but that doesn't change facts). When you try to take that out of our fabric (on topic), and the society that has resulted from it, you create a vacuum, and we all know what that means. Something else fills it. Funny that what it is is NOT tolerance for all, but anti-Christianity- a tolerance of ANYTHING BUT Christianity, especially Biblical values and morals. In the schools for example, the Christian model of creation is soundly opposed BUT the equally 'improvable evolution model is 'preached'. If we're really after 'live and let live' why not leave both out? By scientific model, neither pass the test. Moral guidance is decried, but a new 'morality' is injected nonetheless in the form of humanism...again, not Christianity, but socially engineering and intolerant of Biblical Christianity in spite of it's claims of tolerance. Why not teach neither and leave it to the homes and churches of choice? And this is just the tip of the iceburg. So I find that I must not only tolerate those who pat themselves on the back for their tolerance while spitting in my direction and saying that I am not tolerant, but I get to fund them with my tax dollars. Something is wrong with this picture. chipper

"hfw" wrote in message news:70knf.13530$ snipped-for-privacy@fe04.lga...

Reply to
Chipper

Sorry, but it doesn't sound too reasonable to me...

I get offended when people assume that if I have a problem with public prayer I must be 'antichristian'. IMHO christians are too eager to call themselves 'persecuted' - I feel atheists have a much harder time in this country. I feel offended when people question my values or my morals because I am non religious. And just because i don't think one belief should be imposed on people of different or no religion it does not imply that i have a problem with that belief. People can believe what they see fit and practice their religion at home and at their site of worship - it is the public display that makes me unconfortable, and the attept (of some) to impose those beliefs on the rest of the population.

And let's not get > Much as I don't think this is the venue for these discussions...I'm going to

Reply to
DrQuilter

Very stated.

L>Sorry, but it doesn't sound too reasonable to me...

Reply to
WitchyStitcher

InspirePoint website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.