"Pat P" , blest us all with:
Forgive me for not accommodating your disabilities sufficiently in my response to your request for assistance.
There was no formative rule enhancement in my original post. The post was 100% pure assistance. Many many people would have been *very glad* of the information, at that time.
Here is the original post. Message-ID:
Here is the Google link to the thread resulting from your 'huffishness'.
formatting link
. And, I am *not* a newcomer, I have been lurking here for eons, posting just occasionally. The original post was one of those times. That said, no one has *_any right _* to put their expectations up as evidential or argument in Usenet circles.
*That* is something you do continually and I , for one, find it *_very irritating_*. Forgive me for using my skills and stepping out of the shadows to tell you so. I have rights too. remember that. :-/
I *would be* concerned if it did.
Assume nothing. That is what got you into hot water in the first place. That and an Email Client that does not work - for Usenet.
Certainly OutHouse Distress is not equipped with the tools to rewrite history as you would attempt to force it to do
cheerio :-Þ
jLb